Skip to main content
Log in

The induction of academic staff to a university: processes and products

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interviews with 55 new Lecturers at an Australian university focussed upon early experiences in the institution and attitudes and perceptions regarding teaching and student evaluations. Interview data were used to describe the induction perceived by the Lecturers. Expectations for induction experiences and based on background characteristics of Lecturers were used as criteria in one form of evaluation of the induction process. Evidence of effects of induction processes upon orientations to teaching was used as a second form of evaluation. Help in learning about the institution and special consideration in workload were found to favour the more academically qualified rather than the reverse. Help in solving problems favoured the less academically qualified, those without employment experience in the university, those appointed on probation and those with less impressive publication records. Some evidence was found that special consideration in workload, and the perception of unexpected opportunities were conducive to desirable orientations to teaching. Lecturers who were less self-assured about their teaching competence tended to report participation in development activities more than others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AVVC (Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee). (1981). Academic Staff Development: Report of A VCC Working Party. Occasional Papers No. 4. Canberra.

  • Barrett, E. M., Katz, F. M., & White, R. L. (1974). Becoming a Teacher at the University of New South Wales: Some Impressions of New Staff Members.Research and Development Paper No. 34. Tertiary Education Research Centre, University of New South Wales (mimeo).

  • Bolam, R. (1987). ‘Induction of beginning teachers’. In Dunkin, M. J. (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CTEC (Commonwealth Tertiary Education Commission). Dawkins, J. S. (1988). Higher Education: A Policy Statement. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • CTEC (Commonwealth Tertiary Education Commission). (1988), Review of the Discipline of Engineering, Volume 2. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkin, M. J. (1986). ‘Research on teaching in higher education’. In Wittrock, M. C. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching.(3rd ed.) New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkin, M. J. (1989). Determinants of Academic Career Advancement at an Australian University.Paper submitted for publication. Centre for Teaching and Learning, The University of Sydney.

  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). ‘Student evaluations of university teaching: research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research’. Internationaljournal of Educational Research 11 (3).

  • Tisher, R. P. (1980). ‘The induction of beginning teachers’. In Hoyle, E. & Megarry, L. (eds.), World Yearbook of Education 1980: Professional Development of Teachers. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunkin, M.J. The induction of academic staff to a university: processes and products. High Educ 20, 47–66 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162204

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162204

Keywords

Navigation