Skip to main content
Log in

Decision making under uncertainty: Starr's Domain criterion

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines a decision making under uncertainty criterion first introduced by Starr, which differs from the classical criteria. The rationale and properties of this criterion, called the Domain criterion, are discussed and compared with the traditional approaches of Wald, Hurwicz, Savage and Laplace. The computational complexity and usefulness of the criterion are discussed, as well as the underlying decision philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arrow, K. J.: 1951, ‘Alternative Approaches to the Theory of Choice in Risk-Taking Situations’, Econometrica 19, 404–438.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benson, P. G. and Nichols, M. L.: 1982, ‘An Investigation of Motivational Bias in Subjective Predictive Probability Distributions’, Decision Sciences 13, 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blin, J. -M.: 1976, ‘How Relevant are Irrelevant Alternatives?’, Theory and Decision 7, 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Box, G. E. and Tiao, G. C.: 1973, Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carnap, R.: 1950, Logical Foundations of Probability, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 562–577.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chernoff, Herman: 1954, ‘Rational Selection of Decision Functions’, Econometrica 2, 422–443.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, J. and Hickey, T.: 1979, ‘Two Algorithms for Determining Volumes of Convex Polyhedra’, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 26, 401–414.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coombs, C. H.: 1964, ‘Intransitivity of Preferences: A Test of Unfolding Theory’, in C. H. Coombs, A Theory of Data, Wiley, New York, pp. 106–118.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edwards, W., Lindman, H. and Phillips, L. D.: 1965, ‘Emerging Technologies for Making Decisions’, New Directions in Psychology, Vol. II, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huber, G. P.: 1974, ‘Methods for Quantifying Subjective Probabilities and Multiattribute Utilities’, Decision Sciences 5, 430–458.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jaynes, E. T.: 1968, ‘Prior Probabilities’, IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics SSC-4, 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keynes, J. M.: 1921, A Treatise on Probability, Macmillan and Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krantz, D. H.: 1968, ‘A Survey of Measurement Theory’, Mathematics of the Decision Sciences, Vol. 2 (Edited by Dantzig, G. B. and Veinott, A. F.), Vol. 12 of Lectures in Applied Mathematics, Amer. Math. Society, Providence, R.I., pp. 314–350.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H.: 1957, Games and Decisions, Wiley, New York, pp. 275–309.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marschak et al.: 1975, ‘Personal Probabilities of Probabilities’, Theory and Decision 6, 121–153.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Milnor, John: 1954, ‘Games Against Nature’, Decision Processes (Edited by Throll, Coombs and Davis), Wiley, New York, pp. 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Potter, J. M. and Anderson, B. D. O.: 1980, ‘Partial Prior Information and Decision-Making’, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-10, 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schneller, George and Sphicas, Georghios: 1981, ‘Mixed Dominance in Decision Matrices’, under review for INFORS.

  19. Starr, M. K.: 1962, Product Design and Decision Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Starr, M. K.: 1966, ‘A Discussion of Some Normative Criteria for Decision-Making Under Uncertainty’, Industrial Management Review 8, 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tintner, G.: 1949, ‘Foundations of Probability and Statistical Inference’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A112, Part 3, 251–279.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tversky, Amos: 1972, ‘Choice by Elimination’, J. of Mathematical Psychology 9, 341–367.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: 1974, ‘Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science 1124–1131.

  24. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: 1981, ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice’, Science 211, 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Walster, E. and Festinger, L.: 1964, ‘Decisions among Imperfect Alternatives’, in Conflict, Decision and Dissonance, L. Festinger, Taristock Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zeleny, M.: 1982, Multiple Criterion Decision Making, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneller, G.O., Sphicas, G.P. Decision making under uncertainty: Starr's Domain criterion. Theor Decis 15, 321–336 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162111

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162111

Keywords

Navigation