Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 27, Issue 1–2, pp 146–159 | Cite as

Rotifera as indicators of trophic nature of environments

  • H. C. Arora
Article

Keywords

Methyl Orange Biochemical Oxygen Demand Scenedesmus Spinosa Synedra 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Larora, H. C. 1961. Rotifera as Indicators of Pollution. CPHERI Bull. 3; 4: 24.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Larora, H. C. 1963. Studies on Indian Rotifera Part I. On a Small Collection of Illoricate Rotifera from Nagpur, India with notes on their bionomics. J. Zool. Soc., India 14; 1: 33–44.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berzins, B. 1949. Zur Limnologie der Seen Südostlettlands. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 11: 583–607.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goodnight, C. J. & L. S. Whitley. 1960. Oligochaetes as Indicators of Pollution. Water and Sew. Wks. 107: 34.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Järnefelt, H. 1925. Zur Limnologie einiger Gewässer Finnlands. Ann. Soc. zool. bot. fenn. Vanamo 2: 185–356.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kolxwitz, R. & M. Marsson. 1908. Oekologie der pflanzlichen Saprobien. Ber. bot. Ges., 26a: 505–519.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kolxwitz, R. & M. Marsson1909. Oekologie der tierischen Saprobien. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrographie 2: 126–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lillieroth, S. 1950. Über Folgen Kulturbedingter Wasserstandsenkungen für Makrophyten-und Plankton-gemeinschaften in seichten Seen des südschwedischen Oligotrophiegebietes. Acta limnol., Lund 3: 288.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mackenthun, K. M., W. M. Vanhorn & R. F. Balch. 1956. Biological studies of the Fox River and Green Bay. Co-operative report submitted to the Director, Division of Water Pollution Control, Wisconsin. 47 pp.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pejler, B. 1957. Taxonomical and Ecological Studies on Planktonic Rotatoria from Central Sweden. Kungl. Svenska Vetens kapsakad. Handl. Fjarde Serien. Bd. 6 No. 7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Purdy, W. C. 1926. The Biology of Rivers in Relation to Pollution. J. amer. Water Works Ass. 16, 1: 45–54.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Richardson, R. E. 1928. The Bottom Fauna of the Middle Illinois River, its Distribution, Abundance, Variation and Index Value in the Study of Stream Pollution. Bull. Ill. State Nat. Hist. Surv. 17, 12 86 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patrick, Ruth. 1950. Biological measure of stream conditions. Sew. Ind. Wastes 22: 926.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shrivastava, H. N. 1962. Oligochaetes as Indicators of Pollution. Water and Sew. Wks. 109:40.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shrivastava, H. N. 1962. Oligochaetes as Indicators of Pollution Water and Sew. Wks., 109: 387.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    American Public Health Association Incorporated, New York. 1955. Standard Methods for the examination of Water, Sewage Industrial Waste.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thunmark, S. 1945a. Die Abwässerfrage der Vaxjo Seen in hydrobiologischer Beleuchtung. Grundzüge in der regionalen Planktologie von Süd-schweden. Medd. Lunds Univ. Limnol. Inst. 4: 239.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weston, R. S. & C. E. Turner. 1917. Studies on the digestion of a Sewage Filter effluent by a small and otherwise unpolluted stream. Mass. Inst. Tech., Sanitary Res. Lab. and Sew. Exp. Sta. 10: 1.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Williams, L. G. 1964. Dominant Planktonic Rotifers of major Waterways of the United States. (Private communication).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. W. Junk Publishers 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. C. Arora
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Public Health Engineering Research InstituteNagpur-3

Personalised recommendations