Skip to main content
Log in

Games, goals, and bounded rationality

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A generalization of the standard n-person game is presented, with flexible information requirements suitable for players constrained by certain types of bounded rationality. Strategies (complete contingency plans) are replaced by “policies”, i.e., endmean pairs of goals and controls (partial contingency plans), which results in naturally disconnected player choice sets. Well-known existence theorems for pure strategy Nash equilibrium and bargaining solutions are generalized to policy games by modifying connectedness (convexity) requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aumann, R. J. and Dreze, J. H.: 1974, ‘Cooperative Games with Coalition Structures’, International Journal of Game Theory 3, 217–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge, C.: 1963, Topological Spaces, The Macmillan Company, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilkey, W. J.: 1973, ‘Empirical Evidence Regarding Business Goals’, in Multiple Criteria Decision Making by J. L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny (eds.), University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina, pp. 614–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. G.: 1970, The Lefschetz Fixed Point Theorem, Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G.: 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G.: 1952, ‘A Social Equilibrium Existence Theorem’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 38, 886–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreze, J. H.: 1974, ‘Axiomatic Theories of Choice, Cardinal Utility, and Subjective Probability: a Review’, in Allocation Under Uncertainty: Equilibrium and Optimality, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H.: 1957, Games and Decisions, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J.: 1950, ‘The Bargaining Problem’, Econometrica 18, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J.: 1953, ‘Two-person Cooperative Games’, Econometrica 21, 128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikaido, H.: 1963; Convex Structures and Economic Theory, Academic Press, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A.: 1966, Two-Person Game Theory, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.: 1972. ‘Theories of Bounded Rationality’, in Decision and Origanization, by C. B. McGuire and D. Radner (eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesfatsion, L.: 1980. ‘A Conditional Expected Utility Model for Myopic Decision Makers’, Theory and Decision 12, 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesfatsion, L.: 1978, ‘A New Approach to Filtering and Adaptive Control’, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 25, 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesfatsion, L.: 1979, ‘Direct Updating of Intertemporal Criterion Functions for a Class of Adaptive Control Problems’, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-9, 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesfatsion, L.: 1982, ‘A Dual Approach to Bayesian Inference and Adaptive Control’, Theory and Decision 14, 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesfatsion, L.: 1983, ‘Pure Strategy Nash Equilibrium Points and the Lefschetz, Fixed Point Theorem’, International Journal of Game Theory 12, 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tesfatsion, L. Games, goals, and bounded rationality. Theor Decis 17, 149–175 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160981

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160981

Keywords

Navigation