Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical and ERG data in a family with autosomal dominant RP and Pro-347-Arg mutation in the rhodopsin gene

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a family with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa, documented over six generations, a previously undescribed point mutation in the rhodopsin gene could be identified. The mutation found in the six affected members examined but in none of the controls, including healthy members of the family, was a point mutation in codon 347 predicting a substitution of the amino acid arginine for proline, designated Pro-347-Arg. Six affected members from two generations were examined clinically and with ganzfeld rod and cone electroretinography. The cone and, more dramatically, the rod electroretinograms were reduced to residual b-wave amplitudes or were non-detectable as early as ages 18 to 22 years. The Pro-347-Arg mutation resulted in a subjectively and clinically homogeneous phenotype: early onset of night blindness before age 11, relatively preserved usable visual fields until about age 30, blindness at ages 40 to 60, and change from an initial apparently sine pigmento to a hyperpigmented and atrophic fundus picture between 30 and 50 years of age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Inglehearn CF, Bashir R, Lester DH, Jay M, Bird AC, Bhattacharya SS. A 3-bp deletion in the rhodopsin gene in a family with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Hum Genet 1991; 48: 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dryja TP, McGee TL, Reichel E, Hahn LB, Cowley GS, Yandell DW, Sandberg MA, Berson EL. A point mutation of the rhodopsin gene in one form of retinitis pigmentosa. Nature 1990; 343: 364–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dryja TP, McGee TL, Hahn LB, Cowley GS, Olsson JE, Reichel E, Sandberg MA, Berson EL. Mutations within the rhodopsin gene in patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 1302–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dryja TP, Hahn LB, McGee TL, Cowley GS, Berson EL. Mutation spectrum of the rhodopsin gene among patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: 9370–74.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhattacharya SS, Ingelhearn CF, Keen J, Lester D, Bashir R, Jay M, Bird AC. Identification of novel rhodopsin mutations in patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32(suppl): 890.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berson EL, Rosner B, Sandberg MA, Weigel-DiFranco C, Dryja TP. Ocular findings in patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa and rhodopsin, proline-347-leucine. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111: 614–23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gal A, Artlich A, Ludwig M, Niemeyer G, Schwinger E, Schinzel A. Pro-347-Arg mutation of the rhodopsin gene in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Genomics 1991; 11: 468–70.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ammann E. Zur Vererbung der Hemeralopia hereditaria und tapeto-retinalen Degeneration. Opthalmologica 1946; 112: 78–87.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gouras P. Electroretinography: Some basic principles. Invest Ophthalmol 1970; 9: 557–69.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Niemeyer G. Electroretinography in retinitis pigmentosa. In: Cordelia M, Baratta G, Macaluso C, eds. Corso tecniche elettrofisiologiche in oftalmologia. Fidenza: Casa Ed. Mattioli, 1991: 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gurewitsch K, Niemeyer G. Rod/cone separation by electroretinography, fundus changes and visual fields in retinitis pigmentosa. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1982; 31: 145–53.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Niemeyer G. Indications for rod/cone Ganzfeld electroretinography. Folia Ophthalmol Jpn 1991; 42: 194–97.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hatt M, Niemeyer G. Elektroretinographie bei Morbus Behçet. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1976; 198: 113–20.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sieving PA, Fishman GA. Refractive errors of retinitis pigmentosa patients. Br J Ophthalmol 1978; 62: 163–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Berson EL, Rosner B, Sandberg MA, Dryja TP. Ocular findings in patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa and a rhodopsin gene defect (Pro-23-His). Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 92–101.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heckenlively JR. Retinitis pigmentosa. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Massof RW, Finkelstein D. Two forms of dominant primary retinitis pigmentosa. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1981; 51: 289–346.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fishman GA, Alexander KR, Anderson RJ. Autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa: A method of classification. Arch Ophthalmol 1985; 103: 366–74.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weleber RG, Murphey WH, Rodriguez JA, Lovrien EW, Litt M, Daiger SP. Phenotypic expression of Pro-23-His mutation of rhodopsin in a large family with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32(suppl): 913.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Niemeyer G. Unusual electroretinograms. Dev Ophthalmol 1984; 9: 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Arden GB, Carter CR, Hogg CR, et al. Rod and cone activity in patients with dominantly inherited retinitis pigmentosa: Comparisons between psychophysical and electroretinographic measurements. Br J Ophthalmol 1983; 67: 405–18.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Flannery JG, Farber DB, Bird AC, Bok D. Degenerative changes in a retina affected with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989; 2: 191–211.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niemeyer, G., Trüb, P., Schinzel, A. et al. Clinical and ERG data in a family with autosomal dominant RP and Pro-347-Arg mutation in the rhodopsin gene. Doc Ophthalmol 79, 303–311 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160945

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160945

Key words

Navigation