Abstract
A model of capital accumulation is built in relation with fertility and consumption. Avoiding to impose a direct analytical relationship between these three variables, the author studies the set of possible evolutions under the constraints imposed by the inertia of habit change.
The conflict between the necessity to avoid impoverishment, the desire to increase consumption when possible and the reproduction intensity delineate the set of viable solutions and the set of attitudes leading to capital extinction. This qualitative view of change of behaviors provides an alternative explanation to historical fertility fluctuations outside the usual Easterlin framework.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aubin JP (1992) Viability theory. Birkhäuser, Basel
Bonneuil N (1989) Conjoncture et structure dans les comportements de fécondité, Popu 1, 135–158 (Transl. into English in Contextual and structural factors in fertility behaviour, Popu Eng Select 2 1990)
Chesnais JC (1992) The demographic transition. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Easterlin RA (1980) Birth and fortune. The impact of numbers on personal welfare. Basic Books, New York
Feichtinger G, Dockner EJ (1990) Capital accumulation, endogenous population growth and Easterlin cycles. J Popul Econ 3
Feichtinger G, Sorger G (1990) Capital accumulation, aspiration adjustment, and population growth: Limit cycles in an Easterlin-type model. Math Popul Stud 2:93–103
Frankowska H (1992) Control of nonlinear systems and differential inclusions. Systems and Controls: Foundations and Applications
Saint Pierre P (1994) Discrete approximation and the viability kernel. Appl Math Optim (in press)
Rallu JL, Toulemon L (1993) Les mesures de la fécondité transversale. Popu 2:369–404
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am grateful to the three anonymous referees, who helped to improve this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonneuil, N. Capital accumulation, inertia of consumption and norms of reproduction. J Popul Econ 7, 49–62 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160437
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160437