Skip to main content
Log in

Some logical issues in Madhyamaka thought

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

Premodern works

  • Bhāvaviveka. Prajñāpradīpa. Chs. 1 and 2 ed. M. Walleser. Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buddhapālita. Mūlamadgyamakav \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r}\) tti. Peking bstan- \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{h}\) gyur vol. 95, pp. 73–129. Also Chs. 1–12 ed. M. Walleser in Bibliotheca Buddhica 16. S.-Petersburg, 1913.

  • Candrakīrti. Prasannapadā. In Dwarika Das Shastri, ed. Madhyamakaśāstra of Nāgārjuna. Varanasi: Bauddha Bharati, 1983. Also German translations of some chapters in S. Schayer, 'Ausgewählte Kapitel der Prasannapadā ...' W Krakowie: Polska akademia 33–03 ... 1931 ... (Polska akademia 33–04, Kraków. - Komisja orientalistyczna. Prace. Nr. 14.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dharmakīrti. Nyāyabindu. Chandra Shekhar Shāstrī, ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan, 1982. English translation in S. Stcherbatsky (1930). Buddhist Logic. Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of the USSR (Bibliotheca Buddhica 26). Reprinted New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nāgārjuna. Mūlamādhyamikakārikā (MMK). See the commentators Bhāvaviveka, Buddhapālita, and Candrakīrti, also German translation in M. Walleser's Die Mittlere Lehre des Nāgārjuna (Die Buddhistische Philosophie in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung 2). Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nāgārjuna. Vigrahavyāvartanī. E. Johnston and A. Kunst, eds. In Mélanges Chinois et Bouddhiques 9 (1948–1951): 99–152. bs]Modern works

Modern works

  • Abhyankar, K. V. (1961). A Dictionary of Sanskrit Grammar. Baroda: Oriental Institute (2nd rev. ed. 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Apte, V. S. (1957–1959). Practical Sanskrit-English Dictionary. Poona: Prasad Prakashan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocheński, I. M. (1961). A History of Formal Logic (revised translation by Ivo Thomas of Formale Logik). Notre Dame, Indiana: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conze, E. (1962). Buddhist Thought in India. London: Allen & Unwin (Univ. of Michigan Press, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. C. (1902). A Tibetan-English Dictionary with Sanskrit Synonyms. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daye, D. D. (1986). ‘Metalogical Remarks on the Procrustean Translation of the Buddhist Parārthānumāna into the Anglo-European Predicate Calculus’, in B. K. Matilal and R. D. Evans, eds., Buddhist Logic and Epistemology. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1879). Begriffsschrift. English translation in van Heijenoort (1967), pp. 1–82.

  • Gödel, K. (1931). ‘Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I’, Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38: 173–198. English translation in van Heijenoort (1967), pp. 596–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajiyama, Y. (1973). ‘Three Kinds of Affirmation and Two Kinds of Negation in Buddhist Philosophy’, Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens 17: 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, A. B. (1923). Buddhist Philosophy in India and Ceylon. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1969). Σημɛιωτικη: Recherches pour une sémanalyse. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindtner, C. (1982). Nagarjuniana. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, D. S. (1987). A Study of Svātantrika. Ithaca, N.Y.: Snow Lion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäll, L. (1968). ‘Une approche possible du s'ūnyavāda’, Tel Quel 32: 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matilal, B. K. (1971). Epistemology, Logic, and Grammar in Indian Philosophical Analysis. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monier-Williams, M. (1899). Sanskrit-English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murti, T. R. V. (1955). The Central Philosophy of Buddhism. London: Allen & Unwin (2nd ed. 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, H. (1958). ‘Buddhist Logic Expounded by Means of Symbolic Logic’, Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 7(1): 395–374 [sic].

    Google Scholar 

  • Renou, L. (1942). Terminologie Grammaticale du Sanskrit. Paris: Champion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegg, D. S. (1977). ‘The Uses of the Four Positions of the 33–05 and the Problem of the Description of Reality in Mahāyāna Buddhism’, Journal of Indian Philosophy 5: 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegg, D. S. (1978). ‘Mathematical and Linguistic Models in Indian Thought: The Case of Zero and Śūnyatā’, Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd- und Ostasiens 22: 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegg, D. S. (1983). ‘On the Thesis and Assertion in the Madhyamaka / dbu ma’, in E. Steinkellner and H. Tauscher, eds., Contributions on Tibetan and Buddhist Religion and Philosophy. Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schayer, St. (1931). See, under Premodern works, Candrakīrti

  • Stcherbatsky, Th. (1930). See, under Premodern works, Dharmakīrti

  • Tachikawa, M. (1971). ‘A Sixth-Century Manual of Indian Logic’, Journal of Indian Philosophy 1: 111–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Heijenoort, J. (1967). From Frege to Gödel. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walleser, M. (1911). See, under Premodern works, Nāgārjuna, Mūlamādhyamika- kārikā.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galloway, B. Some logical issues in Madhyamaka thought. J Indian Philos 17, 1–35 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160136

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160136

Keywords

Navigation