Skip to main content
Log in

Budgetary devolution as an aid to university efficiency

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a method of allocating resources within a university which provides departments with a built-in incentive to the efficient use of those resources. Present allocation systems based on norms such as the staff: student ratio, incorporate no such incentive. The method we propose involves firstly the creation of a budget for each recognizable academic unit, the size of the budget being related to the unit's student load by a published formula; and secondly, the devolution to academic units of much greater responsibility in the spending of their budgets on different items, thereby giving them a direct interest in the economical use of costly resources. We argue that initially such a system should be introduced on a pilot basis in selected subjects in a few universities and that the budgets should be designed to cover all recurrent items of expenditure.Footnote 1 We finally consider the implications of budgetary devolution on the planning process within universities and on the methods by which funds are provided by the government to the universities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We do not in this paper consider how units' budgets could be extended to cover the cost of the accommodation they use in order to give them a financial incentive to use space as economically as possible. We have worked out a method of doing this, and although there are practical difficulties, we believe the idea of charging for the use of space is worth testing in practice (Dunworth and Cook, 1975).

References

  • Bottomley, J. A., et al. (1972). Studies in Institutional Management in Higher Education: Costs and Potential Economies. Paris: O.E.C.D.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. R. (1976). “How does the university grants committee determine its allocations of recurrent grants - a curious correlation,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (forthcoming).

  • Department of Education and Science (Annual). Statistics of Education, Vol. 6, Universities. London: HMSO.

  • Dunworth, J. E., and Cook, W. R. (1975). “University teaching accommodation - its use and allocation,” Higher Education Review (Spring).

  • Laidlaw, B., and Layard, R. (1974). “Traditional versus open university teaching methods: a cost comparison.” Higher Education 3:439–467.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A full report appears in Incentives to the Efficient Use of Resources in Universities (June 1975), a report by J. E. Dunworth and W. R. Cook to the Social Science Research Council, who financed this research at the University of Bradford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunworth, J., Cook, R. Budgetary devolution as an aid to university efficiency. High Educ 5, 153–167 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158486

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158486

Keywords

Navigation