Skip to main content
Log in

Can we make sense of learning theory?

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses a range of theoretical models of the learning process that have been published in recent years, and examines whether it is possible to relate them systematically to one another. Problems in such an enterprise include those of terminology; “globe trotting”; the development of separate schools of research that have proceeded largely independently, each with their own central concerns, perspectives, and methodology; and the problem of whether the various different activities popularly described by the word “learning” do in fact have anything much in common. Despite these difficulties, however, the article argues that the various major models each contain certain key concepts, not necessarily identical in each model, from which it is possible to produce a meta-model - a framework or cognitive map within which the individual models can be located and therefore better understood. The article ends by proposing one such meta-model, and suggesting some ways in which it might be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, J. and Cox, C. (eds.) (1980). Advances in Management Education. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binsted, D., Stuart, R. and Long, G. (1980). “Promoting useful management learning: problems of translation and transfer,” pp. 323–349 in Beck, J. and Cox, C. (eds.): Advances in Management Education. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundage, E. H. and MacKeracher, D. (1980). Adult Learning Principles and Their Application to Program Planning. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (ed.) (1981). Developing Student Autonomy in Learning. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. D., Apps, J. W. and Associates (1980). Redefining the Discipline of Adult Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, L. O. and Marton, F. (1978) “Students' conceptions of subject matter: an aspect of learning and teaching in higher education,” Studies in Higher Education 3: 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Toit, C. M. (1982) “The importance of an independent study centre in university education,” Bulletin for University Teachers 14 (4): 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. (1981). Styles of Learning and Teaching. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransson, A. (1977). “On qualitative differences in learning, IV - Effects of motivation and test anxiety on process and outcome,” British Journal of Educational Psychology 47: 244–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy, N. (1978). The Missing Links: British Management Education in the 1980s. London: Foundation for Management Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, R. (1978). “Personality and the development of students in higher education,” in Parker, C. A. (ed.): Encouraging Development in College Students. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huczynski, A. A. (1977). “Education for change”, Education and Training 19 (8): 252–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, L. (1966). Contrary Imaginations. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, K. (1980). “The development of senior managers for the future,” in Beck, J. and Cox, C. (eds.): Advances in Management Education. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, S. and McDonald, R. (1977). Adult Learners in University Courses. Murdoch: Murdoch University, ESTRU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, S. and McDonald, R. (1978). “The learning needs of adult students,” in University of Sydney (ed.): Returning to Study: The Mature Age Student. Sydney: University of Sydney Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, N. (1976). Cognitive Styles in Infancy and Early Childhood. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A., Rubin, I. M. and McIntyre, J. M. (1971) (3rd Edn 1979). Organizational Psychology - An Experiential Approach. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. and Fry, R. (1975). “Towards an applied theory of experiential learning,” in Cooper, C. L. (ed.): Theories of Group Processes. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. and Plovnik, M. S. (1977). “The experiential learning theory of career development,” in van Maanen, J. (ed.): Organisational Careers: Some New Perspectives. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (1979). “The processes of student learning,” Higher Education 8: 395–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, K. H. (1975). Philosophical Concepts and Values in Adult Education. Nottingham: Department of Adult Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B. N. (1976). “Avoidance of aptitude - treatment trivialities,” in Messick, S. (ed.): Individuality in Learning. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, P. H. and Norman, D. A. (1977). Human Informative Processing. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marais, F. A. J. (1982). “Instructional development: a function of the bureau of higher education,” Bulletin for University Teachers 14 (4): 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1975). “What does it take to learn?” In Entwistle, N. and Hounsell, D. (eds.): How Students Learn: Readings in Higher Education. Lancaster: Institute for Post Compulsory Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, A. (1980). Making Experience Pay: Management Success Through Effective Learning. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1973). “Memory, knowledge and the answering of questions,” in Solso, R. L. (ed.): Contemporary Issues in Cognitive Psychology: The Loyola Symposium. Chichester: Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1975). Conversation, Cognition and Learning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1976). “Styles and strategies of learning,” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 128–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1979). “Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment,” Higher Education 8: 411–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revans, R. W. (1980). Action Learning. London: Blond & Briggs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskin, R. (1976). Learning by Experience: Theory and Practice. Bradford: MCB Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummelhart, D. (1977). Introduction to Human Information Processing. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, W. L. (1980). “Typology of adult learning systems,” in Peters, J. M. and Associates (eds.): Building an Effective Adult Education Enterprise. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tough, A. (1971 and 1978). The Adult's Learning Projects. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. D. (1981). Student Learning in Higher Education. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. P. (1980). “Individual learning in groups,” in Boyd, R. D., Apps, J. W. and Associates (eds.): Redefining the Discipline of Adult Education. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Winter Hebron, C. Can we make sense of learning theory?. High Educ 12, 443–462 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158247

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158247

Keywords

Navigation