Abstract
A retrospective study was made of the results of treatment of 100 consecutive patients with congenital dacryostenosis or atresia, in whom conservative treatment was not successful. Syringing and probing had most chance of succeeding in children up to the age of 6 months. The most important cause of recurrence was nasal pathology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennett, J.E. The lacrimal drainage system. In: T.D. Duane, ‘Clinical Ophthalmology’, vol. 5 chapt. 11. Hagerstown, Harper & Row, 1976.
Busse, H. & Hollwich, F. Erworbene Stenosen. In: ‘Erkrankungen der ableitende Tränenwege und ihre Behandlung’. Stuttgart, Enke, 1978, p. 119–126.
Jones, L.T. & Wobig, J.L. Congenital anomalies of the lacrimal system. In: ‘Surgery of the eyelids and the lacrimal system’. Birmingham, Aesculapius, 1976. p. 157–173.
Larsson, S. & Lindgren, S. Surgical treatment of congenital atresia of the nasolacrimal duct. Acta Ophthal. 35: 411–415 (1957).
Picó, G. Congenital anomalies of the lacrimal system. In: E.R. Veirs, ‘The lacrimal system’. Saint Louis, Mosby, 1971. p. 3–9.
Stallard, H.B. Eye Surgery. Bristol, Wright, 1973, p. 267–330.
Veirs, E.R. Congenital abnormalities. In: ‘Lacrimal disorders, diagnosis and treatment’. Saint Louis, Mosby, 1976, p. 37–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sterk, C.C. Probing in congenital dacryostenosis or atresia. Doc Ophthalmol 50, 321–325 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158016
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158016