Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 211–231 | Cite as

U.S. foreign economic policy and illegal immigration

  • Sidney Weintraub


It is often suggested that the most effective policy for the United States, if it wishes to curtail illegal immigration from nearby countries, is to manipulate foreign economic instruments to support their economic development. The Reagan administration's Caribbean Basin Initiative is responsive to this approach in its proposals for increased aid and trade and tax preferences for beneficiary countries. Analysis of U.S. trade, investment, and aid relations with migrant-sending countries leads to the conclusion that these preferences could have a marginal impact on job creation in these countries, but there is no assurance that a modest rise in economic opportunity will lead to a decrease in emigration in the foreseeable future. In addition, preferential trade and tax treatment for some countries involves a departure from U.S. policy and would lead to a clamor for equal treatment by other countries.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Banco de Mexico (1982). Informe Annual 1981. Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
  2. Bean, Frank D., Allan G. King and Jeffrey Passel (1983). “The number of illegal migrants of Mexican origin in the United States: sex ratio-based estimates for 1980,” Demography 20: 99–109.Google Scholar
  3. Bornschier, Volker, C. Chase-Dunn and R. Rubinson (1978). “Cross-national evidence of the effects of foreign investment and aid on economic growth and inequality: A survey of findings and a reanalysis,” American Journal of Sociology 84: 651–683.Google Scholar
  4. Briggs, Vernon M. Jr. (1975). “Illegal aliens: The need for a more restrictive border policy,” Social Science Quarterly 56: 477–484.Google Scholar
  5. Bustamante, Jorge A. (1978). “Emigracion indocumentada a los Estados Unidos,” Foro Internacional 18: 430–463.Google Scholar
  6. Cornelius, Wayne A. (1978). “Mexican migration to the United States: Causes, consequences, and U.S. responses,” Migration and Development Study Group, Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  7. Corrada, Baltasar (1982). “Puerto Rico will benefit,” Foreign Policy 47: 126–128.Google Scholar
  8. Development Assistance Committee: DAC (1982). Development Cooperation, 1982 Review. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  9. Frank, Isaiah (1980). Foreign Enterprise in Developing Countries. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  10. eneral Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: GATT (January, 1982). “Multifibre arrangement extended,” tFocus (Newsletter), p. 1.Google Scholar
  11. Graham, Thomas R. (1980). The Impact of the Tokyo Round Agreements on U.S. Export Competitiveness. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  12. Hansen, Roger D. and others (1982). U.S. Foreign Policy and the Third World: Agenda 1982. New York: Praeger Publishers for the Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
  13. Heckscher, E. (1919). “The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income,” Ekonomisk Tidskrift 21: 497–512, reprinted in American Economic Association, Readings in the Theory of International Trade. Philadelphia: Blakiston, 1949, Chapter 13.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, Mark J. and David J. Yeres (1979). “A massive temporary worker programme for the U.S.: Solution or mirage,” working paper, World Employment Program Research, International Labor Office, Geneva.Google Scholar
  15. Morrison, Thomas K. (1982). “The relationship of U.S. aid, trade and investment to migration pressures in major sending countries,” International Migration Review 16: 4–26.Google Scholar
  16. North, David S. and Marion P. Houstoun (1976). The Characteristics and Role of Illegal Aliens in the U.S. Labor Market: An exploratory Study. Prepared for the Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  17. Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and International Trade. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Portes, Alejandro (1978). “Toward a structural analysis of illegal (undocumented) immigration,” International Migration Review 12: 469–484.Google Scholar
  19. Seligson, Mitchell A. and Edward J. Williams (1981). Maquiladoras and Migration: Workers in the Mexico-United States Border Industrialization Program. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press for the Mexico-United States Border Industrialization Program.Google Scholar
  20. Siegel, Jacob S., Jeffrey S. Passel and J. Gregory Robinson (1980). “Preliminary review of existing studies of the number of illegal residents in the United States.” U.S. Bureau of the Census paper reproduced in Select Commission on Immigration and Refugee Policy, U.S. Immigration Policy and the National Interest, Appendix B to the Staff Report, Washington, D.C., 1981, 15–39.Google Scholar
  21. Snyder, David and Edward Kick (1979). “Structural position in the world system and economic growth, 1955–1970: A multiple-network analysis of transnational interactions,” American Journal of Sociology 84: 1096–1126.Google Scholar
  22. U.S. Department of Justice (1976). Preliminary Report: Domestic Council Committee on Illegal Aliens, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  23. U.S. International Trade Commission (1981a). “Background study of the economies and international trade patterns of the countries of North America, Central America and the Carribean.” Washington, D.C.: mimeographed.Google Scholar
  24. U.S. International Trade Commission (1981b). “U.S. imports for consumption, specified years 1966–80.” Washington, D.C.: mimeographed.Google Scholar
  25. Vialet, Joyce (1980). “U.S. immigration policy: The western hemisphere.” Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, mimeographed.Google Scholar
  26. Vialet, Joyce and Barbara, McClure (1980). Temporary Worker Programs: Background Issues. Senate Report 55–752, 96 Cong. 2 sees., prepared by the Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, for the Select Commission on Immigration and Refugee Policy. Washington, D.C.: Goverment Printing Office.Google Scholar
  27. Weintraub, Sidney (1982). “The Caribbean basin initiative: A flawed model,” Foreign Policy 47: 128–133.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sidney Weintraub
    • 1
  1. 1.LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of TexasAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations