Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the rate of technical change between FmHA and non-FmHA farmers

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses a nonparametric approach to measure technical change. The method is applied to individual farm data from Illinois for the years 1981 and 1984. The farms are divided into those that receive subsidized credit and those that do not. The results indicate similar rates of technical change for the two groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afriat, S.N. 1972. Efficiency Estimation of Production Functions. International Economic Review October 13:368–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aigner, D.J., and S.F. Chu. 1968. On Estimating the Industry Production Function. American Economic Review September 58:826–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aigner, D.J., C.A.K. Lovell, and P.J. Schmidt. 1977. Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production and Models. Journal of Econometrics July 6:21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Units. European Journal of Operation Research November 2:429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E. 1980. Capital and the Theory of Productivity Measurement. American Economic Review May 70:260–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E., and E. Parkan. 1983. Linear Programming Tests of Regularity Conditions for Production Functions. In Quantitative Studies on Production and Prices (Würzburg-Wien: Physica-Verlag) pp. 131–158.

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and C.A.K. Lovell. 1985. The Measurement of Efficiency of Production (Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M.J. 1957. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, pp. 253–281.

  • Førsund, F.R., and L. Hjalmarsson. 1979. Frontier Production Functions and Technical Progress: A Study of General Milk Processing in Swedish Dairy Plants. Econometrica July 47:883–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F.R., and L. Hjalmarsson. 1987. Analysis of Industrial Structure: A Putty-Clay Approach (Stockholm, Sweden: The Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W., and J. van den Broeck. 1977. Efficiency Estimation From Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Errors. International Economic Review June 18:435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimizu, M., and John Page, Jr. 1982. Total Factor Productivity Growth, Technological Progress and Technical Efficiency Change: Dimensions of Productivity Change in Yugoslavia, 1956–1978. The Economic Journal December 92:920–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, J. 1974. Estimating the Efficiency of Production. International Economic Review June 15:515- 521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, D. 1985. Productive Performance in West German Manufacturing Industry 1970–80: A Farrell Frontier Characterization. The Journal of Industrial Economics March 33:295–316.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The refereeing process of this paper was handled by L. Hjalmarsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grabowski, R., Mehdian, S. A comparison of the rate of technical change between FmHA and non-FmHA farmers. J Prod Anal 1, 155–163 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157794

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157794

Keywords

Navigation