Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal cartel trigger strategies and the number of firms

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent empirical papers have analyzed collusion in the Joint Executive Committee in an attempt to determine which of several theories of cartel behavior is supported by the behavior of this 19th century railroad cartel. Non-parametric tests of whether high and low profit regimes followed a first-order Markov process when one controls for the number of firms support the theory of optimal collusion given by Abreu, Pearce, and Stachetti. Results on whether transition probabilities depend on the number of firms are inconclusive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AbreuD., PearceD., and StachettiE. (1986) ‘Optimal Cartel Equilibria with Imperfect Monitoring’, Journal of Economic Theory, 39, 251–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • BerryS. T. and BriggsH. C. (1988) ‘A Non-Parametric Test of a First-Order Markov Process for Regimes in a Non-cooperatively Collusive Industry,’ Economics Letters, 27, 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoslettS. R. and LeeLung-Fei. (1985) ‘Serial Correlation in Latent Variable Models,’ Journal of Econometrics, 27, 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • EllisonG. (1994) ‘Theories of Cartel Stability and the Joint Executive Committee,’ RAND Journal of Economics, 25, 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • GreenE. J. and PorterR. H. (1984), ‘Non-Cooperative Collusion under Imperfect Price Information,’ Econometrica, 52, 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajivassiliou, V. (1989) ‘Testing Game-Theoretic Models of price-Fixing Behavior,’ Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper no. 935.

  • LeeLung-Fei, and PorterR. H. (1984) ‘Switching Regression Models with Imperfect Sample Separation Information,’ Econometrica, 52, 391–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacAvoyP. (1965) The Economic Effects of Regulation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • PorterR. H. (1983a) ‘Optimal Cartel Trigger Price Strategies,’ Journal of Economic Theory, 29, 313–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • PorterR. H. (1983b) ‘A Study of Cartel Stability: The Joint Executive Committee, 1880–86,’ Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • RotembergJ. J. and SalonerG. (1986) ‘A Supergame-Theoretic Model of Price Wars During Booms,’ American Economic Review, 76, 390–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulen, T. S. (1978) ‘Cartels and Regulation’, Ph.D. dissertation (Stanford University, Stanford California).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Briggs, H. Optimal cartel trigger strategies and the number of firms. Rev Ind Organ 11, 551–561 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157778

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157778

Key words

Navigation