Abstract
Recent empirical papers have analyzed collusion in the Joint Executive Committee in an attempt to determine which of several theories of cartel behavior is supported by the behavior of this 19th century railroad cartel. Non-parametric tests of whether high and low profit regimes followed a first-order Markov process when one controls for the number of firms support the theory of optimal collusion given by Abreu, Pearce, and Stachetti. Results on whether transition probabilities depend on the number of firms are inconclusive.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AbreuD., PearceD., and StachettiE. (1986) ‘Optimal Cartel Equilibria with Imperfect Monitoring’, Journal of Economic Theory, 39, 251–269.
BerryS. T. and BriggsH. C. (1988) ‘A Non-Parametric Test of a First-Order Markov Process for Regimes in a Non-cooperatively Collusive Industry,’ Economics Letters, 27, 73–77.
CoslettS. R. and LeeLung-Fei. (1985) ‘Serial Correlation in Latent Variable Models,’ Journal of Econometrics, 27, 79–97.
EllisonG. (1994) ‘Theories of Cartel Stability and the Joint Executive Committee,’ RAND Journal of Economics, 25, 37–57.
GreenE. J. and PorterR. H. (1984), ‘Non-Cooperative Collusion under Imperfect Price Information,’ Econometrica, 52, 87–100.
Hajivassiliou, V. (1989) ‘Testing Game-Theoretic Models of price-Fixing Behavior,’ Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper no. 935.
LeeLung-Fei, and PorterR. H. (1984) ‘Switching Regression Models with Imperfect Sample Separation Information,’ Econometrica, 52, 391–418.
MacAvoyP. (1965) The Economic Effects of Regulation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
PorterR. H. (1983a) ‘Optimal Cartel Trigger Price Strategies,’ Journal of Economic Theory, 29, 313–338.
PorterR. H. (1983b) ‘A Study of Cartel Stability: The Joint Executive Committee, 1880–86,’ Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 301–314.
RotembergJ. J. and SalonerG. (1986) ‘A Supergame-Theoretic Model of Price Wars During Booms,’ American Economic Review, 76, 390–407.
Ulen, T. S. (1978) ‘Cartels and Regulation’, Ph.D. dissertation (Stanford University, Stanford California).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Briggs, H. Optimal cartel trigger strategies and the number of firms. Rev Ind Organ 11, 551–561 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157778
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157778