Skip to main content
Log in

A note on price cap regulation and competition

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the properties of a price-cap regulatory regime similar in design to a plan recently proposed by AGT Ltd. in hearings on Alternative Forms of Regulation before the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission. The price-cap plan incorporates a number of novel features which include (i) quantity weights that evolve through time rather than remaining fixed; (ii) adjustments for productivity that incorporate yardstick competition; and (iii) allowing the weights to reflect the firm's market power or absence thereof in the presence of competition. Hence, should competitive circumstances permit, the regulatory regime allows for its own sunset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AGT Ltd. (1994) ‘Evidence of AGT Ltd. in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 92–78’, Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • BaronD. P. (1989) ‘Design of Regulatory Mechanisms and Institutions’, Chapter 24 in R.Schmalensee and R. D.Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1347–1447.

    Google Scholar 

  • BeesleyM. E. and LittlechildS. C. (1989) ‘The Regulation of Privatized Monopolies in the United Kingdom’, Rand Journal of Economics 20(3), 454–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • BraeutigamR. R. and HillmanJ. H. (1989) Price Level Regulation for Diversified Public Utilities, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • BraeutigamR. R. and PanzarJ. C. (1989) ‘Diversification Incentives under Price-based and Cost-based Regulation’, Rand Journal of Economics 20(3), 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • BraeutigamR. R. and PanzarJ. C. (1993) ‘Effects of the Change from Rate of Return to Price-cap Regulation’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 83(2), 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • BrennanT. J. (1989) ‘Regulating by ‘Capping’ Prices’, Journal of Regulatory Economics 1(1), 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • BrownS. J. and SibleyD. S. (1989) The Theory of Public Utility Pricing, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • CabralL. M. B. and RiordanM. H. (1989) ‘Incentives for Cost Reduction under Price Cap Regulation’, Journal of Regulatory Economics 1(1), 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Communications Commission (1992), ‘Price Cap Performance Review for AT&T’, CC Docket No. 92-134, notice of inquiry, July 17.

  • Federal Communications Commission. CC Docket No. 94-1, Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers, released September 27, 1995.

  • GalalA, JonesA., TandonP., and VogelsangI. (1994) Welfare Consequences of Selling PublicEnterprises, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • KridelD. J., SappingtonD. E. M., and WeismanD. L. (1996) ‘The Effects of Incentive Regulation in the Telecommunications Industry: A Survey’, The Journal of Regulatory Economics 9(3), 269–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • LandesW. M. and PosnerR. A. (1981) ‘Market Power in Antitrust Cases’, Harvard Law Review 94, March, 937–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • LynchJ. G., BuzasT. E., and BergS. V. (1994) ‘Regulatory Measurement and Evaluation of Telephone Service Quality’, Management Science 40(2), 169–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • MitchellB. M. and VogelsangI. (1991) Telecommunications Pricing: Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • SappingtonD. E. M. (1980) ‘Strategic Firm Behavior under a Dynamic Regulatory Adjustment Process’, Bell Journal of Economics 11(1), 360–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • SappingtonD. E. M. and SibleyD. (1992) ‘Strategic Non-linear Pricing under Price-cap Regulation’, Rand Journal of Economics 23(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • SappingtonD. E. M. and WeismanD. L. (1996) Designing Incentive Regulation for the Telecommunications Industry, American Enterprise Institute, Washington D.C. and MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShleiferA. (1985) ‘A Theory of Yardstick Competition’, Rand Journal of Economics 16(2), 319–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • TaylorL. D. (1994) Telecommunications Demand in Theory and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • VogelsangI. and FinsingerJ. (1979) ‘A Regulatory Adjustment Process for Optimal Pricing by Multiproduct Monopoly Firms’, Bell Journal of Economics 10(1), 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • WeismanD. L. (1993) ‘Superior Regulatory Regimes in Theory and Practice’, Journal of Regulatory Economics 5(2), 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are grateful to Bruce Egan, Jerry Langin-Hooper, David Sappington and an anonymous referee for numerous constructive suggestions and insights on an earlier draft of this paper. The usual caveat applies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, L.D., Weisman, D.L. A note on price cap regulation and competition. Rev Ind Organ 11, 459–471 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157773

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157773

Key words

Navigation