Abstract
Two studies are reported which examine factors influencing the approach to study of Australian tertiary students from a traditional, psychometric perspective (supported by student comments). Study I, with 199 first year students as subjects, indicates that being interested in the subject, seeking an honours grade, and being assessed by essay rather than multiple choice examinations are factors which independently encourage the student to adopt a deep level approach to study. Student comments suggest that the lecturer's enthusiasm and teaching ability has a significant impact on student interest level. Lack of time for study is another factor seen as leading to a surface level approach. Tertiary study was often seen as requiring a deeper approach and harder work. Comments of mature age entrants showed that in general they had thought more about the learning process and had not wandered into tertiary education like some of the recent school leavers. Study II was a conceptual replication of the work of Ramsden and Entwistle, which appeared in the 1981 volume of the British Journal of Educational Psychology. The responses of 292 senior year students indicated that students adopting a deep level approach to study were more likely to perceive their courses as encouraging independence in both attitudes and approach to learning and as being challenging but not over burdening. These results were discussed in terms of the need for students and lecturers to think more about the learning process itself and the need for more to be done to assist the transition to tertiary learning of recent school leavers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biggs, J. B. (1973). “Study behaviour and performance in objective and essay tests,” Australian Journal of Education 17: 157–167.
Biggs, J. B. (1976). “Dimensions of study behaviour: another look at ATI,” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 68–80.
Bowden, J. and Anwyl, J. (1981). “Student learning skills: attitudes of Australian academics in universities and CAE's,” in A. H. Miller (ed.), Research and Development in Higher Education, Volume 3. Sydney: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
Brew, A. (1981). “Underlying themes in study methods teaching,” Paper presented at International Conference on Higher Education, Lancaster.
Elton, L. R. B. and Laurillard, D. M. (1979). “Trends in research on student learning,” Studies in Higher Education 4: 87–102.
Fransson, A. (1977). “On qualitative differences in learning: IV. Effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome,” British Journal of Educational Psychology 47: 244–257.
Frieze, I. and Bar-Tal, D. (1981). “Developmental trends in cue utilization for attributional judgements,” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, in press.
Laurillard, D. (1979). “The process of student learning,” Higher Education 8: 395–409.
Mathias, H. (1981). “University learning and the school experience,” Paper presented at International Conference on Higher Education, Lancaster.
Melton, R. F. (1981). “Individualized learning methods in perspective,” Higher Education 10: 403–423.
Ramsden, P. (1979). “Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment,” Higher Education 8: 411–427.
Ramsden, P. and Entwistle, N. J. (1981). “Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying,” British Journal of Educational Psychology 51 (3): 368–383.
Robbins, Lord (1966). The University in the Modern World. London: Macmillan.
Rogers, C. G. (1980). “The development of sex differences in evaluations of others's successes and failures,” British Journal of Educational Psychology 50: 243–252.
Säljö, R. (1979). “Learning about learning,” Higher Education 8: 443–451.
Thomas, P. R. and Bain, J. D. (1981) “Learning strategies in context,” Paper presented at International Conference on Higher Education, Lancaster.
Watkins, D. (1982). “Identifying the study process dimensions of Australian university students,” Australian Journal of Education 26: 76–85.
Watkins, D. and Hattie, J. (1981). “The learning processes of Australian university students: investigations of contextual and personological factors,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, in press.
Watkins, D. and Malimas, B. C. (1980). “Faculty and student orientations to tertiary education: a case study of a Filipino university,” Higher Education 9: 707–720.
Watkins, D. and Morstain, B. (1980). “The educational orientations of lecturers and their students: a case of an Australian university,” Australian Journal of Education 24: 155–163.
Watkins, D., Slee, J. and Mortimore, G. (1981). “Reactions to university life,” Student Performance and Progress Study, No. 19, Australian National University.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R. and Cox, P. W. (1977). “Field-dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications,” Review of Educational Research 47: 1–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watkins, D. Factors influencing the study methods of Australian tertiary students. High Educ 11, 369–380 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157655
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157655