Skip to main content
Log in

Welfare and product testing by a regulated monopolist

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies a monopoly firm with the ability to conduct costly pre-market testing of its product in order to predict how safe this product is to consume. While there are private incentives to test, the amount of testing effort supplied by a monopolist need not be optimal. In a model which allows for an imperfect system of liability, we characterize and compare the allocations of testing effort and output at the full social optimum, the pure monopoly solution, and the second-best regulated optimum wherein the regulator chooses testing effort and the monopolist chooses output and price.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K. J. 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention”. In The Rate and Direction of Economic Activity:Economic and Social Factors, Universities-National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Series. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beals, H., R. Craswell, and S. Salop. 1981. “The Efficient Regulation of Consumer Information.” Journal of Law and Economics 24: 491–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butters, G. 1983. “A Sequential Sampling Model of Advertising Substantiation.” mimeo F.T.C. Bureau of Economics.

  • Campbell, T. S., Y-S Chan, and A.M. Marino. 1990. “Motivating Managers to Acquire Information When There is a Conflict of Interest.” Working Paper: University of Southern California, Graduate School of Business Administration.

  • Craswell, R. 1988. “Precontractual Investment as an Optimal Precaution Problem.” Journal of Legal Studies 17:401–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, H. G., and J. M. Vernon. 1983. The Regulation of Pharmaceuticals. Washington D. C.: The American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. 1981. “The Informational Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure about Product Quality.” Journal of Law and Economics 24: 461–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwerel, E. 1980. “Economic Welfare and the Production of Information by a Monopolist.” Bell Journal of Economics 11: 505–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino, A. M. 1988. “Monopoly, Liability and Regulation.” Southern Economic Journal 54:913–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, S., and A. Postlewaite. 1985. “Quality Testing and Disclosure.” Rand Journal of Economics 16: 328–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1986. “Relying on Information of Interested Parties.” Rand Journal of Economics 17: 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. 1959. “The Simple Economics of Basic Research.” Journal of Political Economy 67: 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polinski, A. M., and W. Rogerson. 1983. “Products Liability, Consumer Misperceptions and Market Power.” Bell Journal of Economics 14: 581–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K., and M. L. Weitzman. 1981. “Funding Criteria for Research, Development and Exploration Projects.” Econometrica 49: 1261–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A. 1985. “Products Liability, Corporate Structure and Bankruptcy: Toxic Substances and the Remote Risk Relationship.” Journal of Legal Studies 14: 689–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. 1984a. “A Model of the Optimal Use of Liability and Safety Regulation.” Rand Journal of Economics 15: 271–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. 1984b. “Liability for Harm versus Regulation of Safety.” Journal of Legal Studies 13: 357–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. 1980. “Strict Liability versus Negligence.” Journal of Legal Studies 9: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campbell, T.S., Chan, YS. & Marino, A.M. Welfare and product testing by a regulated monopolist. J Regul Econ 3, 57–68 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157611

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157611

Keywords

Navigation