Skip to main content
Log in

Entry into the electric power industry

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Entry of new firms into the electric power industry is becoming commonplace. The entrants typically are unregulated firms that compete with regulated electric utilities only in the generation stage of the latter's vertically integrated structure. Because of the asymmetric regulatory treatment of the incumbents and entrants, there is the possibility of biases either against efficient entry or for inefficient entry. A model of a vertical integrated utility subject to rate-of-return regulation is used to illustrate the biases, and several implications for regulatory policy are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, Scott, and Joe Kerkvliet 1989. “Dual Measures of Monopoly and Monopsony Power: An Application to Regulated Electric Utilities.” Review of Economics and Statistics 71 (May): 250–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averch, H., and L.L. Johnson. 1962. “Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint.” American Economic Review 52: 1052–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, Paulette, Douglas Gegax, and John Tschirhart. 1989. “Industrial Cogeneration and Regulatory Policy.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 1 (September): 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Sanford V., and John Tschirhart. 1988. Natural Monopoly Regulation: Principles and Practice New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Timothy J. 1989. “Regulating by Capping Prices.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 1 (June): 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burness, H.S., W.D. Montgomery, and J.P. Quirk. 1980. “Capital Contracting and the Regulated Firm.” American Economic Review 70: 342–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral, Luis M.B., and Michael H. Riordan. 1989. “Incentives for Cost Reduction under Price Cap Regulation.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 1 (June): 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, Michael A., and Paul R. Kleindorfer. 1979. Public Utility Economics New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 1987. Regulatory Independent Power Producers: A Policy Analysis. Washington, D.C.: Office of Economic Policy, (October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 1988. “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Administrative Determination of Full Avoided Cost, Sales of Power to QFs and Interconnecting Facilities.” RM 88-6-000 (March).

  • Henderson, J. Stephen. 1985. “Cost Estimation for Vertically Integrated Firms: The Case of Electricity.” Analyzing the Impact of Regulatory Change in Public Utilities edited by Michael A. Crew. Massachusetts: Lexington Books 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idaho Public Utilities Commission. 1980. “Rulemaking Proceedings for the Consideration of Cogeneration and Small Power Production.” Case no. P-300-12.

  • Joskow, Paul L. 1974. “Inflation and Environmental Concern: Structural Change in the Process of Public Utility Price Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 17: 291–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, Paul L. 1989. Regulatory Failure, Regulatory Reform, and Structural Change in the Electric Power Industry. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics edited by Martin N. Bailey and Clifford Winston. Brookings, Washington D.C. 125–208.

  • Joskow, P.L. and D.R. Jones. 1983. “The Simple Economics of Industrial Cogeneration.” The Energy Journal (January): 1–21.

  • MacAvoy, Paul W., Daniel F. Spulber, and Bruce E. Stangle. 1989. “Is competitive Entry Free? Bypass and Partial Deregulation in Natural Gas Markets.” Yale Journal in Regulation 6: 209–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino, Anthony M., and Joseph Sicilian. 1988. “The Incentive for Conservation Investment in Regulated Utilities.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (June): 173–188.

  • Meyer, Robert A. 1975. “Monopoly Pricing and Capacity Choice Under Uncertainty.” American Economic Review 65 (June): 326–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzar, John C. 1976. “A Neoclassical Approach to Peak Load Pricing.” Bell Journal of Economics 7: 521–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzar, John C. 1980. “Sustainability, Efficiency, and Vertical Integration.” Regulated Industries and Public Enterprise edited by P. Kleindorfer and B. Mitchell. Massachusetts: Lexington Books. 171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzar, John C., and Robert D. Willig. 1977. “Free Entry and the Sustainability of Natural Monopoly.” Bell Journal of Economics 8: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, Ray. 1986. “Indivisibilities, Pricing and Investment: The Case of the Second Best.” Zeitschrift fuer Nationaloekonomie: 195–210.

  • Electric Utility Systems and Practices 1983. 4th ed., edited by Homer M. Rustebakke. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligson, Carl H. 1989. “Driving Forces for Change in the Electric Power Industry.” Public Utilities Fortnightly 124 (October): 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, Roger. 1989. “Pricing Periods Under Rate-of-Return Regulation.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 1 (June): 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spulber, Daniel F. 1989. Regulation and Markets Cambridge, MA: MTT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschirhart, John. 1989. “Partial Regulation of Natural Monopoly.” in The Political Economy of Government Regulation edited by Jason F. Shogren, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Charles W. 1989. “Prudence Audits are Narrowing Our Energy Choices.” Public Utilities Fortnightly 123 (May): 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tschirhart, J. Entry into the electric power industry. J Regul Econ 3, 27–43 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157609

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157609

Keywords

Navigation