Skip to main content
Log in

Discrepancies between single stimulus and multiple stimulus visual field examinations with the Peritest semi-automated perimeter in glaucoma patients

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a total of 24 randomly selected eyes of glaucoma patients, tested with the automated (single stimulus) and the manual (multiple stimulus) modes of the semi-automated Peritest perimeter, the numbers and depths of defects were compared as estimated with these two different measurement strategies. It was found that with the manual technique considerably less defects were detected than with the automated strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Greve EL. Single stimulus and multiple stimulus threshold. Vision Res 1972; 12: 1533–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langerhorst, C.T., Bakker, D., Felius, J. et al. Discrepancies between single stimulus and multiple stimulus visual field examinations with the Peritest semi-automated perimeter in glaucoma patients. Doc Ophthalmol 82, 135–140 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157003

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157003

Key words

Navigation