Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The importance of efficient use in the adoption of technology: A micro panel data analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Even after the introduction of the new rice technology (Green revolution) about more than two decades ago, the food shortage problem has not decreased significantly in many developing countries. Obviously, there can be no dispute over the importance of the new rice technology in bringing about improvements in agricultural productivity. But, there are factors other than the choice of technology which are equally important, and a neglect of these factors may lead to a complete negation of any possible gains in productivity arising from the use of new technology. One such factor is the efficient use of the technology. This paper examines farm-specific application of the new rice technology by using a micro-level panel data from a South Indian district. The results show a wide variation in the efficient use of the technology by the sample farmers. Extension and education were identified as two major constraining factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner, D.J., C.A.K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt. 1977. Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models. Journal of Econometrics 6: 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G.E. and G. Corra, 1977. Estimation of a Production Frontier Model: With Application to the Pastoral Zone of Eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 21: 169–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H.P. and J.P. Quinzon. 1980. Factor and Output Market Effects of Technical Change and Public Investments Policies in Agriculture. New Haven, CT: Economic Growth Center, Discussion Paper No. 357, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhri, D.P. 1979. Education, Innovation and Agricultural Development, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M.J. 1957. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120: 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fare, R., S. Groskopf, and C.A.K. Lovell. 1985. The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G., R.E. Just, and D. Zilberman. 1985. Adoption of Agricultural Innovation in Developing Countries: A Survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change 33: 255–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsund, F. and L. Hjalmarsson. Frontier Production Function and Technical Progress: A Study of General Milk Processing in Swedish Dairy Plants. Econometrica 47: 883–900.

  • Forsund, F., C.A.K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt. 1980. A Survey of Frontier Production Functions and of Their Relationships to Efficiency Measurement. Journal of Econometrics 13: 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y. 1981. Induced Innovation, Green Revolution and Income Distribution: Comment. Economic Development and Cultural Change 30: 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.J. and F.S. Bagi. 1984. Technical Efficiency on Individual Farms in Northwest India. Southern Economic Journal 51: 108–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, D.T. and L.J. Lau. 1982. Farmer Education and Efficiency, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G.L. 1967. A Note on Nonconventional Inputs and Conventional Productivity Function. In C. Eicher and L. Witt (eds.) Agricultur in Economic Development, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jondrow, J., C.A.K. Lovell, I.S. Materov, and P. Schmidt. 1982. On the Estimation of Technical Efficiency in the Stochastic Frontier Production Function Model. Journal of Econometrics 19: 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalirajan, K.P. and J.C. Flinn. 1983. The Measurement of Farm Specific Technical Efficiency. Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics 2: 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalirajan, K.P. and R.T. Shand. 1985. Types of Education and Agricultural Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis of Tamil Nadu Rice Farming. Journal of Development Studies 21: 232–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimizu, M. and J.M. Page. 1982. Total Factor Productivity Growth, Technological Progress and Technical Efficiency Change: Dimensions of Productivity Change in Yugoslavia, 1965–78. The Economic Journal 92: 920–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W. and J. Van den Broeck. 1977. Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error. International Economic Review 18: 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, M.M. and L.F. Lee. 1981. The Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in the Indonesian Weaving Industry. Journal of Development Economics 9: 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Programme Evaluation Organisation (PEO)—Australian National University (ANU). 1979. The High Yielding Varieties Programme in India, 1970–75. part II, Government of Inida Press, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C.R. 1965. Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan, V.W. 1977. The Green Revolution: Seven Generalizations. International Development Review 19: 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, P. 1985. Frontier Production Functions. Econometric Reviews 4: 289–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, P. and R.C. Sickles. Production Frontier and Panel Data. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2: 367–374.

  • Stevenson, R.E. 1980. Likelihood Functions for Generalized Stochastic Frontier Estimation. Journal of Econometrics 13: 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, F. 1970. Education in Production. Journal of Political Economy 8: 35–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The refereeing process of this paper was handled through N.R. Adam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalirajan, K.P. The importance of efficient use in the adoption of technology: A micro panel data analysis. J Prod Anal 2, 113–126 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156342

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156342

Keywords

Navigation