Skip to main content
Log in

How not to rank universities

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Cartter, A. M. (1966). An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. V., Lindzey, G., and Coggeshall, P. E. (eds.) (1982). An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States, 5 vols. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roose, K. D. and Andersen, C. J. (1970). A Rating of Graduate Programs. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, B. T. (1984). “New edition of a guide to colleges' quality gets a mixed response from scholars, educators,” Chronicle of Higher Education, 28: 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. S. (1982). “Academic quality rankings: why they developed in the United States and not Europe,” History of Higher Education Annual, 2: 102–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. (1984). “Professors attack university rating report's credibility,” Pennsylvania State University Collegian, 82: 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Webster, D.S. How not to rank universities. High Educ 14, 101–109 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155655

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155655

Navigation