Abstract
Comparisons are made of experimental studies on the drag, at high Reynolds number, due to regular arrays of roughness elements of various shapes immersed in a turbulent boundary layer. Using a variant of Millikan's dimensional analysis, the form of the velocity profile is deduced in terms of the dimensions and concentration of the roughness elements. A drag formula results which is shown to be in good agreement with data. Available measurements of the partition of drag between the elements and the intervening surface indicates that equipartition occurs at quite low concentrations. The interaction between elements is then small, so that the drag coefficient of a typical roughness element is nearly constant.
A re-examination of some of O'Loughlin's velocity-profile data, obtained below the tops of the roughness elements, suggests the existence of a nearly constant-stress layer scaled to the shear stress of the intervening surface. Above the roughness elements, the mean-velocity profile undergoes a transition to the form appropriate to the total shear stress exerted by the roughened surface. A formula is given which describes the one-dimensional velocity profile over the entire range, excluding the viscous sublayer on the intervening surface. The viscous sublayer appears to correspond quite closely to that on a smooth plate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antonia, R. A. and Luxton, R. E.: 1971, ‘The Response of a Turbulent Boundary Layer to a Step Change in Surface Roughness’. Part 1 ‘Smooth to Rough’, J. Fluid Mech. 48, 721–61.
Bradley, E. F.: 1965, ‘Studies of Wind Drag on the Earth’, Ph. D. thesis, Australian National University.
Bradley, E. F.: 1968, ‘A Micrometeorological Study of Velocity Profiles and Surface Drag in the Region Modified by a Change in Surface Roughness’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 361–79.
Businger, J. A., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y., and Bradley, E. F.: 1971, ‘Flux-Profile Relationships in the Atmospheric Surface Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 181–89.
Clauser, F. H.: 1956, ‘The Turbulent Boundary Layer’, Adv. Appl. Mech. 4, 1–51.
Coles, D.: 1956, ‘The Law of the Wake in the Turbulent Boundary Layer’, J. Fluid Mech. 1, 191–226.
Corrsin, S. and Kistler, A. L.: 1955, ‘Free-Stream Boundaries of Turbulent Flows’, NACA Rep. 1244.
Dryden, H. L.: 1953, ‘Review of Published Data on the Effect of Roughness on Transition from Laminar to Turbulent Flow’, J. Aero. Sci. 20, 477–82.
Einstein, H. A. and Banks, R. B.: 1950, ‘Fluid Resistance of Composite Roughness’. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 31, 603–10.
Elliott, W. P.: 1958, ‘The Growth of the Atmospheric Internal Boundary Layer’, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 39, 1048–54.
Hawthorne, W. R.: 1951, ‘Secondary Circulation in Fluid Flow’, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 206, 374–87.
Hawthorne, W. R. and Martin, M. E.: 1955, ‘The Effect of Density Gradient and Shear on the Flow over a Hemisphere’, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 232, 184–95.
Izumi, Y. and Barad, M. L.: 1970, ‘Wind Speeds as Measured by Cup and Sonic Anemometers and Influenced by Tower Structure’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 9, 851–56.
Koloseus, H. J. and Davidian, J.: 1966, ‘Free-Surface Instability Correlations, and Roughness-Concentration Effects on Flow over Hydrodynamically-Rough Surfaces’, USGS Water-Supply Paper 1592-C, D.
Kutzbach, J. E.: 1961, ‘Investigations of the Modification of Wind Profiles by Artificially Controlled Surface Roughness’, Univ. of Wisconsin, Dept. of Meteorol., Annual Report, pp. 71–113.
Lettau, H. H.: 1967, Problems of Micrometeorological Measurements, in E. F. Bradley and O. T. Denmead (eds.), The Collection and Processing of Field Data, Interscience, New York, pp. 3–40.
Lettau, H. H.: 1969, ‘Note on Aerodynamic Roughness-Parameter Estimation on the Basis of Roughness-Element Description’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 8, 828–32.
Liu, C. K., Kline, S. J., and Johnson, J. P.: 1966, ‘An Experimental Study of Turbulent Boundary Layer on a Rough Wall’, Thermosciences Div., Mech. Eng. Dept., Report MD-15, Stanford University.
Marshall, J. K.: 1970, ‘Assessing the Protective Role of Shrub-Dominated Range-Land Vegetation Against Soil Erosion by Wind’, Proc. Intern. Grassland Congr., Surfers Paradise, 11, 19–23.
Marshall, J. K.: 1971, ‘Drag Measurements in Roughness Arrays of Varying Density and Distribution’, Agric. Meteorol. 8, 269–92.
Millikan, C. B.: 1938, ‘A Critical Discussion of Turbulent Flows in Channels and Circular Pipes’, Proc. 5th Intern. Congr. Appl. Mech., Cambridge, Mass., pp. 386–92.
Mons, R. F. and Sforza, P. M.: 1968, ‘The Three-Dimensional Wake Behind an Obstacle on a Flat Plate’, Polytech. Inst. of Brooklyn, PIBAL Rep. No. 68–20.
Moore, W. L.: 1951, ‘An Experimental Investigation of the Boundary-Layer Development Along a Rough Surface’, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Iowa.
Morris, H. M.: 1955, ‘A New Concept of Flow in Rough Conduits’, Trans. Am. Soc. Civil Engrs. 120, 373–98.
Nikuradse, J.: 1933, ‘Strömungsgesetze in rauhen Rohren’, Forschungshefte 361, VDI; NACA Tech. Mem. 1292, 1950.
O'Loughlin, E. M.: 1965, ‘Resistance to Flow over Boundaries with Small Roughness Concentrations’, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Iowa.
O'Loughlin, E. M. and Annambhotla, V. S. S.: 1969, ‘Flow Phenomena near Rough Boundaries’, J. Hydraul. Res. 7, 231–50.
O'Loughlin, E. M. and Macdonald, E. G.: 1964, ‘Some Roughness-Concentration Effects on Boundary Resistance’, La Houille Blanche 19, 773–82.
Panofsky, H. A. and Townsend, A. A.: 1964, ‘Change of Terrain Roughness and the Wind Profile’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 90, 147–55.
Perry, A. E., Schofield, W. H., and Joubert, P. N.: 1969, ‘Rough Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers’ J. Fluid Mech. 37, 383–413.
Roberson, J. A.: 1961, ‘Surface Resistance as a Function of the Concentration and Size of Roughness Elements’, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Iowa.
Roberson, J. A.: 1968, ‘Surface Resistance of Plane Boundaries Roughened with Discrete Geometric Shapes’, Bull. 308, College of Engineering, Washington State University.
Roberson, J. A. and Chen, C. K.: 1970, ‘Flow in Conduits with Low Roughness Concentration’, J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 96, 941–57.
Rouse, H. (ed): 1959, Advanced Mechanics of Fluids, Wiley, New York.
Sayre, W. W. and Albertson, M. L.: 1961, ‘Roughness Spacing in Rigid Open Channels’, Proc. Am. Soc. Civil Engrs, Hydraul. Div. 87, 121–50.
Schlichting, H.: 1936, ‘Experimentelle Untersuchungen zum Rauhigkeitsproblem’, Ing.-Arch. 7, 1–34; NACA Tech. Mem. 823.
Squire, H. B. and Winter, K. G.: 1951, ‘The Secondary Flow in a Cascade of Airfoils in a Nonuniform Stream’, J. Aero. Sci. 18, 271–77.
Tani, I.: 1961, Effect of Two-Dimensional and Isolated Roughness on Laminar Flow, in Boundary Layer and Flow Control, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 637–56.
Thwaites, B.: 1960, Incompressible Aerodynamics, Oxford University Press.
Tillmann, W.: 1953, ‘Neue Widerstandsmessungen an Oberflächenstörungen in der turbulenten Reibungsschicht’, Forschungshefte Schiffstechnik 1, 81–88.
Von Karman, Th.: 1934, ‘Turbulence and Skin Friction’, J. Aero. Sci. 1, 1–20.
Wieghardt, K.: 1953, ‘Erhöhung des turbulenten Reibungswiderstandes durch Oberflächenstörungen’, Forschungshefte Schiffstechnik 1, 65–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was initiated while the authors were with the Division of Plant Industry, CSIRO.
At present on leave at the Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S.A.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wooding, R.A., Bradley, E.F. & Marshall, J.K. Drag due to regular arrays of roughness elements of varying geometry. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 5, 285–308 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155238
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155238