Skip to main content
Log in

The structure of sunspots

I: Observational constraints; current sheet models

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a first step in constructing three-dimensional decaying sunspot models we select the relevant observational data. From these we conclude:

  1. (i)

    sunspots, except the smallest, obey a radial and evolutionary similarity;

  2. (ii)

    sunspots may be considered as isolated, fairly well defined flux tubes, wrapped in thin current sheets;

  3. (iii)

    a substantial number among stable regular spots show a phase of slowest decay whose rate is independent of the spot's area.

Arguments are given that the slowest rate of decay is ultimately determined by Ohmic dissipation in the inner part of the current sheet. Preliminary asymptotic models for the deep layers (deeper than 2000 km below the photosphere) are given which satisfy the above three constraints. To meet the observed rate of slowest decay the current sheet has to be very thin, about 10−5 to 10−4 times the umbral radius.

Radial large-scale fluid motions are required in the current sheet to maintain the similarity of the structure. The radial motions are linked with the vertical motions which may be connected with the Evershed flow.

Finally we discuss details which are less relevant in the large-scale structure of stable sunspots, such as fine structures, twists, the break-down of the similarity and the relation between sunspots and smaller magnetic structures, and the intrinsic scatter in some observed quantities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, M. G.: 1969, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 145, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckers, J. M. and Schröter, F. H.: 1969, Solar Phys. 10, 384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, R. J. and Loughhead, R. E.: 1964, Sunspots, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broxon, J. W.: 1949, Phys. Rev. 75, 606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumba, V.: 1963, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech. 14, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitre, S. M.: 1963, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 126, 431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chistyakov, V. F.: 1962, Soviet Astron. A. J. 6, 363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, T. G.: 1946, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 106, 218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, T. G.: 1953, in G. P. Kuiper (ed.), The Sun, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, R. E.: 1961, Astrophys. J. 134, 289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deinzer, W.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 141, 548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhale, M. H.: 1972, in preparation.

  • Hale, G. E., Ellerman, F., Nicholson, S.B., and Joy, A.H.: 1919, Astrophys. J. 49, 153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hénoux, J. C.: 1969, Astron. Astrophys. 2, 288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, E., Nordø, J., and Ringnes, T. S.: 1955, Astrophys. Norv. 5, 167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klüber, H. von: 1947, Z. Astrophys. 24, 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopecky, M. and Kuklin, G. V.: 1966, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech. 17, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, O. K. and Maltby, P.: 1969, Solar Phys. 8, 275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musman, S.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 149, 201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, S. B.: 1933, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 45, 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, L.: 1968, Solar Phys. 3, 543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piddington, J. H.: 1954, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 114, 629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, B. D.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 156, 707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter, A. and Temesvary, St.: 1958, in B. Lehnert (ed.), ‘Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics’, IAU Symp. 6, 263.

  • Schmidt, H. U.: 1968, in K.O. Kiepenheuer (ed.), ‘Structure and Development of Solar Active Regions’, IAU Symp. 35, 95.

  • Schröter, E. H.: 1966, Atti del Convegno sulle Macchi Solari, Firenze, p. 222.

  • Schröter, E. H.: 1971, in R. Howard (ed.), ‘Solar Magnetic Fields’, IAU Symp. 43, 167.

  • Severny, A. B.: 1965, Soviet Astron.-A. J. 9, 171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruit, H. Ch.: 1972, in preparation.

  • Steenbeck, V. M. and Krause, F.: 1969, Astron. Nachr. 291, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stellmacher, G. and Wiehr, E.: 1970, Astron. Astrophys. 7, 432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, Y.: 1961, Bull. Kyoto Gakugi Univ. Ser. B 19, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, Y.: 1967, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 19, 220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandberg-Hanssen, E.: 1956, Astrophys. Norvegica 5, 207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldmeier, M.: 1939, Astron. Min. Zürich 138, 439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. R. and Cannon, C. J.: 1968, Solar Phys. 4, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. R. and McIntosh, P. S.: 1969, Solar Phys. 10, 370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, A. and Schröter, E. H.: 1969, Solar Phys. 10, 357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun, H. S.: 1968, Theoretical Sunspot Models, Ph.D. Thesis, Indiana University (summary: Astrophys. J. 162 (1970), 975).

  • Yun, H. S.: 1971, Solar Phys. 16, 398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhugzhda, Yu.D.: 1970, Soviet Astron.-A.J. 14, 274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, C.: 1965, Rech. Astron. Obs. Utrecht 17, Part 4.

  • Zwaan, C.: 1967, Solar Phys. 1, 478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, C.: 1968, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 6, 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, C. and Buurman, J.: 1971, in R. Howard (ed.), ‘Solar Magnetic Fields’, IAU Symp. 43, 220.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gokhale, M.H., Zwaan, C. The structure of sunspots. Sol Phys 26, 52–75 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155105

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155105

Keywords

Navigation