Skip to main content
Log in

Problems relating to examinations in three-year technical/natural science courses of study at the Federal Armed Forces University, Munich

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Part 1 Zimmermann describes the conditions of study, taking as a starting point the considerations relating to the founding of Federal Armed Forces universities in Hamburg and Munich and explaining their educational concept. He then gives an account of the organization, modus operandi and curricular considerations of the Federal Armed Forces University, Munich. These observations are focussed on the successful attempts to offer scientific study courses (four in Hamburg and seven in Munich) providing, after three and a quarter to, at the most, four years, qualifications which are equal in standard to the corresponding diplomas of public universities. Owing to the fact that study courses are shorter and equal in standard, the success rate is, by comparison, slightly lower at the moment. This applies in particular to the technical/natural science courses. The reasons for this will be indicated. As a result of this situation, there is a desire for optimum examination procedures.

Ulbricht reports in Part 2 on a study of the problems relating to examinations which he conducted at the Faculty of Aerospace Engineering. First of all he discusses the criteria for “good” grading procedures, then describes the four most common ones and applies them to the results of a written test in engineering mechanics held as part of the preliminary diploma examination; a quantitative comparison produces remarkable results. In conclusion, he studies the required length of the written test and proposes that it should be halved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Unterricht und Kultus (l978). “Bayerisches Hochschulgesetz (BayHSchG)”. Bayerisches Gesetz- und Verordnungsblatt (GVBL) 1978: 791–830, corr. 958.

  • Beggs, D. L. and Lewis, E. L. (1915). Measurement and Evaluation in the Schools. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bildungskommission beim Bundesminister der Verteidigung (1971). Neuordnung der Ausbildung und Bildung in der Bundeswehr. Bonn: Bundesministerium der Verteidigung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1976). “Hochschulrahmengesetz (HRG)” Bundesgesetzblatt I 10/1976: 185–206.

  • Gaude, P. and Teschner, W. P. (1973). Objektivierte Leistungsmessung in der Schule. Frankfurt a.M./Berlin/München: Moritz Diesterweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmel, L. J. (1970) Measurement and Evaluation in the Schools. London: Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klauer, K. J., Fricke, R., Herbig, M., Rupprecht, H. and Schott, F. (1972). Lehrzielorientierte Tests. Düsseldorf: Schwann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, L. E. (1971). “Evaluation of learning in science”, pp. 559–641 in B. S. Bloom, J. T. Hastings and G. F. Madaus (eds.), Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lienert, G. A. (1969). Testaufbau und Testanalyse. Weinheim/Berlin/Basel: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. and Novick, M. R. (1974) Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D. (1969). Testtheorie. Wien: Deuticke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millman, J. (1974). “Criterion-referenced measurement”, pp. 309–397 in W. J. Popham (ed.), Evaluation in Education. Berkely, CA: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. C. and Hopkins, K. D. (1972). Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technische Universität München (1978). Materialien zur Entwicklung der Technischen Universität München von 1945 bis 1977. München: Technische Universität München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulbricht, K. (1979). Theorie und Praxis lernzielorienter Prüfungen in Schule und Hochschule. Bern/Frankfurt a.M./Las Vegas: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulbricht, K. and Zimmermann, P. (1979/80). “Reformierte Studiengänge der Technik und Prüfungsproblematik: Untersuchungen zur Gestaltung von Prüfungen im Fach Mechanik bei dreijähriger Regelstudienzeit an der Hochschule der Bundeswehr München”, technic didact 4: 209–271 and 5: 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is a considerably revised version of an essay entitled “Reformed Study Courses in Engineering: Investigations into the Design of Examinations in Engineering Mechanics following a Three-Year Prescribed Period of Study at the Federal Armed Forces University, Munich” which appeared in 1979/80 in technic didact 4: 209–217 and 5: 11–21.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ulbricht, K., Zimmermann, P. Problems relating to examinations in three-year technical/natural science courses of study at the Federal Armed Forces University, Munich. High Educ 10, 1–23 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154888

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154888

Keywords

Navigation