Abstract
The main conclusion of this survey of the way in which the British University Grants Committee (UGC) has acted as an intermediary between government and universities is that the UGC secures the maximum degree of self-government possible at any given time. How great that “maximum” is depends essentially on the power and purposes of the two principals (government and universities) rather than on the limited powers of the go-between (the UGC). Whereas for the first 45 years of its existence the relations between the principals were such as to focus attention on the UGC as “buffer,” changes in those relations since 1963 have emphasised the fact that the UGC is also a “coupling” between state and higher education. The pressures of economic circumstance and government action have suppressed the “euphoria” that accompanied the expansionist fifties and sixties, but to kill the messenger would be inappropriate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, M. S. (1979). Social Origins of Educational Systems, London: Sage.
Ashby, Eric (Lord) (1968). Hands Off the Universities? London: Birbeck College.
Ashworth, J. M. (1982). “Reshaping Higher Education in Britain”. Royal Society of Arts Lecture.
Berdahl, R. O. (1959). British Universities and the State. Berkeley: University of California.
Committee of Public Accounts (1981). Tenth Report, Session 1980–81. HC 233, London: HMSO.
Dodds, H. W., Hacker, L. M. and Rogers, L. (1952). Government Assistance to Universities in Great Britain. New York: McGraw-Hill.
James of Rusholme, Lord (1967). The Universities and the Idea of Liberty. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand.
Kogan, M. (1975). Educational Policy-Making. London: Allen and Unwin.
Kogan, M. (1978). The Politics of Educational Change. London: Fontana.
Livingstone, H. (1974). The University: An Organisational Analysis. London and Glasgow: Blackie.
McConnell, T. R. (1966). The University and the State. Berkeley: University of California Center for Research and Development in Higher Education.
McConnell, T. R., Berdahl, R. O. and Fay, M. (1973). From Elite to Mass to Universal Higher Education: The British and American Transformations. Berkeley: University of California Center for Research and Development in Higher Education.
Moodie, G. C. and Eustace, R. B. (1974). Power and Authority in British Universities, London: Allen and Unwin.
Morris, A. (1972). “The UGC and the mystery of the UGC cake,” Times Higher Education Supplement, 21 July.
Owen, T. A. (1980). “Is the UGC's buffer principle at risk?” Times Higher Education Supplement, 9 May.
Perkins, H. (1969). Key Profession. The History of the Association of University Teachers. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Pratt, J. (1975). “The UGC Department”. Higher Education Review, Spring.
Robbins, Lord (1963). Higher Education. The Report of the Committee on Higher Education, Cmd. 2154. London: HMSO.
Tapper, T. and Salter, B. (1978). Education and Political Order. London: Macmillan.
Times Higher Education Supplement (1980). Articles on “Manpower Planning” by Williams, G. and Fulton, O. and by Rudd, E. 25 July.
University Grants Committee (1958). University Development 1952–57, Cmd. 534. London: HMSO.
University Grants Committee (1968). University Development 1962–67. Cmd. 3820. London: HMSO.
Van de Graaf, J., Clark, B. R., Furth, D., Goldschmitt, D. and Wheeler, D. F. (1978). Academic Power. Patterns of Authority in Seven National Systems of Higher Education. New York: Praeger.
Zimmern, Sir Alfred (1936). The League of Nations and the Rule of Law. London: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moodie, G.C. Buffer, coupling, and broker: Reflections on 60 years of the UGC. High Educ 12, 331–347 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154428
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154428