Skip to main content
Log in

Improving social practice through the utilization of university-based knowledge

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditionally, the university has been defined as a center for the production and communication of knowledge, much of it practice-relevant. As one looks-farther along the chain leading from knowledge production to its ultimate utilization, however, the results have been disappointing, notably in the “soft” sciences. One means of heightening knowledge use is that of strengthening the formal links between centres of higher education and centres of application. In the study reported here, formalized arrangements were made between colleges or faculties of education and surrounding school systems, and the knowledge flows between the two sets of institutions were studied from the perspective of knowledge transfer theory and interorganizational theory. The study yielded a set of “core” variables, that could then be clustered into a general model indicating how successful transfers of knowledge can be made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, S. (1979). Interorganizational Processes and Organizational Boundary Activities. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. (1977). Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J. (1975). “The interorganizational network as a political economy,” Administrative Science Quarterly 20: 229–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., Aram, J. and Bachner, D. (1979). “Interorganizational information-sharing: a successful intervention that failed,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 10 (4): 553–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. and Guba, E. (1976). A Faculty Self-Report on Knowledge Production and Utilization Activities in Schools, Colleges and Departments of Education. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. and Guba, E. (1977). The Role of Higher Education in Educational Knowledge Production and Utilization. Bloomington: Indiana University, Deans' Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D., McKibbin, S. and Malkas, M. (1981). Alternative Perspectives for Viewing Educational Organizations. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, G. (1973). “A history of the impact of research on teaching,” in R. Travers, ed., Second Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. (1977). “Exchange and power: networks of interorganizational exchanges,” Sociological Quarterly Winter: 62–82.

  • Evan, W. (1966). “The organization set: toward a theory of interorganizational relations,” in J. Thompson, ed., Approaches to Organizational Design. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, R. (1974). “Persistence and loose coupling in living systems,” Behavioral Science 18: 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). “Strength of weak ties,” American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, R. (1969). Planning for Innovation. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, CRUSK, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, R. (1981). School-University Collaboration Supporting School Improvement. Vol. III, Eastern Private University Case. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education (No. 400–79–0063).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. (1981). School-University Collaboration Supporting School Improvement. Vol. I, Midwestern State Case. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education (No. 400–79–0063).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. and Levinson, N. (1982). “Paths to Knowledge Transfer: Barriers and Facilitators in Interorganizational Arrangements”. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M., Levinson, N., Havelock, R. and Cox, P. (1981). “Interorganizational arrangements: an approach to educational practice improvement”, Knowledge 3 (1): 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, N. (1981). School-University Collaboration Supporting School Improvement. Vol. II, Eastern State University Case. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education (No. 400–79–0063).

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation (CERI)(1976–77). Recurrent Education: Policies and Trends. Country Reports. Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R. (1979). “The development of an interorganizational central network”, Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 140–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N. and Fombrun, C. (1979). “Network analysis in organizational settings”, Human Relations 32(2): 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. (1967). “The interorganizational field as a focus for investigation”, Administrative Science Quarterly 12: 396–419.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huberman, A.M. Improving social practice through the utilization of university-based knowledge. High Educ 12, 257–272 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154422

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154422

Keywords

Navigation