Skip to main content
Log in

The formulation of marketing strategy in urban public transport

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper prescribes the parameters of marketing strategy formulation in the context of urban public transport and emphasises in particular the usefulness of the marketing mix and segmentation concepts. A marketing mix comprising the two primary dimensions of service attributes and promotion is advocated, the service attributes to include price, in-vehicle time, mesh density, frequency, reliability and comfort. Three primary trip purpose segments are identified viz. journey-to-work, shopping, and leisure/social trip segments, but these may be expanded into a twenty-four cell matrix once origin-destination and car access factors are included. The sensitivity of demand in these segments is examined mostly by reference to demonstration and experimental project data drawn from the United States and the United Kingdom. For the three primary trip purpose segments demand elasticity is shown to be greater for non-price than for price features; for both price and non-price service features elasticity is shown to be a function of journey purpose being least elastic for journey-to-work trips and most elastic for social/leisure trips. The role of promotion is examined and its importance to the successful marketing of public transport clearly demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District and W. C. Gilman and Co. (1966). “The Radial Express and Suburban Cross-Town Bus Rider,” INT-MTD-8 PB 174 220, St. Louis.

  • Blackman, John Associates (1968). Mass Transportation in a Small City. Newcastle, Penn.: Newcastle Transit Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, T. (1968). “Skokie Swift — The Commuter's Friend.” Chicago: Chicago Transit Authority, PB 175 734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles River Associates, Inc. (1968). An Evaluation of Free Transit Service. Boston: Charles River Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob, T. F., Canty, E. T. and Gustafson, R. L. (1972). “An Analysis of Consumer Preferences for a Public Transportation System,” Transportation Research 6: 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. J. and Quarmby, D. A. (1970). “The Value of Time in Transport Planning: A Review,” MAU Note 154, Department of the Environment.

  • Hoinville, G. and Johnson, E. (1972). ”Commuter Preferences: Summary Report.” Social and Community Planning Research, July.

  • Hovell, P. J. (1969). “Applying the Marketing Concept to Urban Passenger Transport,” British Journal of Marketing, 3, pp. 152–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovell, P. J. and Jones, W. H. (1970). “The Formby Bus-Rail Demonstration Project: A Pre-Service Feasibility Study.” Liverpool: University of Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovell, P. J. and Jones, W. H. (1971). “The Formby Bus-Rail Demonstration Project: A Study of its Effect on Modal Split for the Journey to Work.” Liverpool: University of Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institut d'Aménagement et d'Urbanisme de la Région Parisienne (1963). “Choix du Moyen de Transport par les Usagers.” October.

  • Jones, W. H. (1972). “The Formby Bus-Rail Demonstration Project: A Survey Analysis of the Changed Demand Patters.” Liverpool: University of Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. H. (1975). “The Demand for Urban Public Transport: an Empirical Marketing Analysis.” Ph. D. Thesis, University of Liverpool.

  • Kemp, M. A. (1973). “Some Evidence of Transit Demand Elasticities”. Transportation, Vol. 2, pp. 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassow, W. (1968). “The Effects of a Fare Increase on the Number of Passengers Carried,” Union Internationale des Transports Publics, Review, Volume XVII, No. 2, pp. 119–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, C. A. (1970). “A Behavioural Approach to Modal Split Forecasting,” Transportation Research, Vol. 3. No. 4, pp. 463–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, J. F. and Associates (1964). “Mass Transportation in Massachusetts.” Transportation Commonwealth of Massachusetts P.B. 174 422, July.

  • McGillivray, R. G. D. (1970). “Demand and Choice Models of Modal Split;” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. IV, 2, pp. 192–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, A. J. (1973). “Marketing and Transit.” Ph. d. Thesis, University of Liverpool.

  • Motor Transport (1972). “Rome Fares Experiment,” pp. 18–19.

  • Oi, W. Y. and Schuldiner, P. (1962). An Analysis of Urban Travel Demand. Chicago: Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, F. T., Nash, A. N., Hille, G. T. and Brunner, G. A. (1967). “Consumer Conceived Attributes of Transportation.” University of Maryland: Department of Business Administration.

  • Passenger Transport (1967). “Decatur and Peoria Premium Special Services.” May, pp. 183–187.

  • Port Authority of Allegheny County and Transport Research Institute of Carnegie-Mellon University (1970). “Advertising and Promotion Demonstration Programme.” PA MTD-7. Pittsburgh.

  • Quarmby, D. A. (1967). “Choice of Travel Model for the Journey-to-Work; some findings,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 1, 3, pp. 273–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segelhorst, S. W. (1971). “Transit Validation for City Centres,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 5, 1, pp. 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, L. M. (1965). Marketing Urban Mass Transit. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.E.P.A.C.T. I and II (1966). “Commuter Rail/Road Service Improvement for a Metropolitan Area.” PA-MTD-I.

  • Smith, M. G. and McIntosh, P. T. (1973). “Public Response to Change in Fare Levels: Proceedings of a Symposium on Public Transport Fare Structures.” Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopher, P. R. (1969). “A Probability Model of Travel Mode Choice for the Work Journey”, Highway Research Record 283, pp. 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. M. (1967). “An Evaluation of Two Proposals for Traffic Restraint in Central London,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Vol. 130, pt. 3, pp. 327–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers Morgan, R. and Partners (1974). “Costing of Bus Operations: An Interim Report of the Bradford Bus Study.” West Yorkshire Metropolitan Council, July.

  • TriState Transportation Commission (1967). “Park-‘n’-Ride Rail Service: Final Report,” PB 174 740. New York.

  • Tyson, W. J. (1972). “Financing of Public Transport,” Local Government Finance, pp. 273–276.

  • Van Tassell, R. C. (1956). “Economics of the Pricing of Urban Bus Transportation.” Brown University, Ph. D. Thesis. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission (1965). “The Minibus in Washington D.C. - Final Report.” DC-MTD-2.

  • Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission and Sidney Hollander and Associates (1969). ”Transit Information Aids,” INT-MTD-10.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is a condensation of material appearing in The Management of Urban Public Transport: a marketing approach, by P. J. Hovell, W. H. Jones, and A. J. Moran, to be published by Saxon House and Lexington Books in 1975.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moran, A.J., Jones, W.H. The formulation of marketing strategy in urban public transport. Transportation 4, 209–229 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153576

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153576

Keywords

Navigation