Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Group size and the free-rider hypothesis: A re-examination of old evidence from churches: Comment

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper comments on a recent study by Lipford (1995) which rejects the hypothesis of free ridership. This paper contends that Lipford's analysis suffers from two serious misspecification errors. A re-examination of Lipford's results suggests that free ridership could occur. Other hypotheses, however, are also consistent with the new results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brown, C. and Medoff, J. (1989). The employer size-water effect. Journal of Political Economy 97: 1027–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.W. and Roozen, D.A. (1990). Congregational identities in the Presbyterian church. Review of Religious Research 31: 351–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieslak, M.J. (1984). Parish responsiveness and parishioner commitment. Review of Religious Research 26: 132–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilke, J.C. (1980). Voluntary contributions and monitoring efforts: Revealed preferences for the services of religious organizations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 19: 138–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, D.R. (1994). Introduction: The problem of understanding church giving. Review of Religious Research 36: 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipford, J. (1995). Group size and the free rider hypothesis: An examination of new evidence from churches. Public Choice 83: 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. and Caddell, D. (1994). Generous congregations, generous givers: Congregational contexts that stimulate individual giving. Review of Religious Research 36: 168–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, D.H. (1985). Simultaneous determination of church contributions and church attendance. Economic Inquiry 23: 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaleski, P.A. and Zech, C.E. (1992). Determinants of contributions to religious organizations. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 51: 459–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaleski, P.A. and Zech, C.E. (1995). Paying for pastors: Do market forces matter? Unpublished paper presented to the Missouri Valley Economics Association Annual Meetings.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Villanova University, 19085, Villanova, PA

    Peter A. Zaleski & Charles E. Zech

Authors
  1. Peter A. Zaleski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Charles E. Zech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaleski, P.A., Zech, C.E. Group size and the free-rider hypothesis: A re-examination of old evidence from churches: Comment. Public Choice 88, 407–411 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153241

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153241

Keywords

Search

Navigation