Skip to main content
Log in

Bureaucratic behavior and the choice of labor input: A study of municipal governments

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Berle, A. and Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, T., Bush, W. and Spann, R. (1977). The effects on public spending of the divisibility of public output in consumption, bureaucratic power, and the size of the tax-sharing group. In T. Borcherding (Ed.), Budgets and bureaucrats: The sources of government growth, 211–288. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, M. and Zardkoohi, A. (1978). A test of the property-rights theory of the firm: Water utilities in the United States. Journal of Law and Economics (October): 395–408.

  • Davis, D. (1971). The efficiency of public versus private firms: The case of Australia's two airlines. Journal of Law and Economics (April): 149–165.

  • Davis, D. (1977). Property rights and economic efficiency of the Australian case revisisted. Journal of Law and Economics (April): 223–226.

  • De Alessi, L. (1969). Implications of property rights for government investment choices. American Economic Review (March): 13–24.

  • Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy (April): 288–307.

  • Fama, E. and Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics (June): 301–325.

  • Goetz, C. (1977). Fiscal illusion in state and local finance. In T. Borcherding (Ed.), Budgets and bureaucrats: The sources of government growth, 176–187. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Analysis (October): 395–360.

  • Manne, H. (1965). Mergers and the market for corporate control. Journal of Political Economy (April): 110–120.

  • Orzechowski, W. (1977). Economic models of bureaucracy: Survey, extension and empirical evidence. In T. Borcherding (Ed.), Budgets and bureaucrats: The sources of government growth, 229–259. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puviani, A. (1960). Die Illusionen in der öffentlichen Finanzwirtschaft. Berlin: Dunker and Humbolt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1965). The politics of bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. (1983). County and city data book: A statistical abstract supplement, Table D, 861–863.

  • Wagner, R. (1976). Revenue structure, fiscal illusion, and budgetary choice. Public Choice (Spring): 45–61.

  • Williamson, O. (1983). Organization form, residual claimants, and corporate control. Journal of Law and Economics (June): 351–366.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zardkoohi, A., Giroux, G. Bureaucratic behavior and the choice of labor input: A study of municipal governments. Public Choice 64, 185–190 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153164

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153164

Keywords

Navigation