Skip to main content
Log in

The political market for real income redistribution through choice of the weights in COLAs

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies alternative cost-of-living indexes derived from the generalized Fechner-Thurstone (GFT) utility form, their use in contracts for cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs), and the resulting effect of choice of index on the distribution of real income. The indexes and their distributional effects are compared to the officially reported Consumer Price Index (CPI) and a CPI computed from the same data set used to compute the GFT indexes. It is found that the choice of index used in adjustment clauses in contracts has an impact on the distribution of real income of the group. As an example, the U.S. federal government schedule of wages and salaries is adjusted from 1981 through 1984 by all of the indexes reported here. Use of alternative indexes illuminates the normative assumptions regarding the relative importance of different income strata (among other things) implicit in any public practice of pegging COLAs to a single form of price index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basmann, R.L. (1985). On the serial correlation of stochastic taste changers in direct utility functions. Econometric Theory 1: 192–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmann, R.L., Molina, D.J. and Slottje, D.J. (1983). Budget constraint prices as preference changing parameters of generalized Fechner-Thurstone direct utility functions. American Economic Review 73: 411–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmann, R.L., Molina, D.J. and Slottje, D.J. (1984a). A note on aggregation of Fechner-Thurstone direct utility functions. Economic Letters 14: 117–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmann, R.L., Molina, D.J. and Slottje, D.J. (1984b). Variable consumer preferences, economic inequality, and cost-of-living. Advances in Econometrics 3: 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmann, R.L., Diamond, C.A., Frentrup, J.C. and White, S.N. (1985a). Variable consumer preferences, economic inequality, and the cost-of-living concept: Part two. Advances in Econometrics 4: 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmann, R.L., Diamond, C.A., Frentrup, J.C. and White, S.N. (1985b). On deviations between neoclassical and GFT-based true cost-of-living indexes derived from the same demand system. Journal of Econometrics 30: 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmann, R.L. and Slottje, D.J. (1987). The sensitivity of the true cost-of-living to price- and income-induced changes in aggregate consumers' tastes. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 5: 483–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmann, R.L., Diamond, C.A. and Slottje, D.J. (1988). Relative price changes, cost-of-living adjustments and their redistributional effects. Center for Policy Studies, Clemson University, working papers series.

  • Blackorby, C. and Donaldson, D. (1983). Preference diversity and aggregate economic cost-of-living indexes. Proceedings from a conference sponsored by Statistics Canada entitled Price Level Measurement. Published under the authority of the Minister of Supply and Services Canada. (December): 373–409.

  • Braithwait, S.D. (1980). The substitution bias of the Laspeyres price index: An analysis using estimated cost-of-living indexes. American Economic Review 70 (1): 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1978a). Revising the consumer price index. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1978b). The consumer price index: Concepts and content over the years. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Report 517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1983). Problems in measuring consumer prices. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Report 697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1984). Handbook of Methods, Volume II: The consumer price index. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Bulletin 2134–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. and Muellbauer, J. (1980). Consumer behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E. (1983). The theory of the cost-of-living index and the measurement of welfare change. Proceedings from a conference sponsored by Statistics Canada entitled Price Level Measurement. Published under the authority of the Minister of Supply and Services Canada (December): 163–239.

  • Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I.N. (1922, 1927, 1967). The making of index numbers. New York: A.M. Kelley, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, R.P. (1982). The variability of inflation rates across household types. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 4 (November): 494–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokoski, M.F. (1987). Problems in the measurement of consumer cost-of-living indexes. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 5 (1): 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konyus, A.A. (1924). The problem of the true cost of living. Econometric Bulletin of the Institute of Economic Conjecture [Moscow: (1924), No. 9–10]. English translation in Econometrica 7 (1936): 110–129.

  • Jorgenson, D.W. and Slesnick, D.T. (1983). Individual and social cost-of-living indexes. Proceedings from a conference sponsored by Statistics Canada entitled Price Level Measurement. Published under the authority of the Minister of Supply and Services Canada. (December): 241–336.

  • Michael, R.T. (1979). Variation across households in the rate of inflation. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 11: 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, J.L. (1975). Whose cost of living? Journal of Royal Statistical Society 138: 540–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W.A., Jr. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine and Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R.A. (1980). Group cost-of-living indexes: Recent developments in the economic theory of index numbers. American Economic Review 70 (2): 274–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R.A. (1981). The social cost of living index. Journal of Public Economics 15: 311–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. (1970 April), Director's law of public income redistribution. Journal of Law and Economics 13: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slottje, D.J. (1987). Relative price changes and inequality in the size distribution of various components of income. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 5: 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1965). The politics of bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1983). Economics of income redistribution. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1986). The economics of wealth and poverty. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We wish to thank Mason Gerety and Kathy Hayes for helpful criticisms of the first drafts of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basmann, R.L., Diamond, C.A., Scully, G.W. et al. The political market for real income redistribution through choice of the weights in COLAs. Public Choice 64, 103–120 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153158

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153158

Keywords

Navigation