Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of affinity membranes and conventional affinity matrices with regard to protein purification

  • Published:
Biotechnology Techniques

Summary

Binding capacities for purified malate dehydrogenase from pig heart and malate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli were determined for different gel matrices and a Cibacron Blue modified membrane. During batch adsorption the membrane has nearly the same capacity as Blue Sepharose. During filtration the effective capacity of the membrane was increased in contrast to Blue Sepharose. With cell homogenates, when used under cross-flow conditions, the membrane displayed better performance than Blue Sepharose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Lowe, C.R., Pearson, J.C., (1984), Methods in Enzymology 104, 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, A.S., Matson, S.L., (1985), Desalination, 53, 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scawen, M.D.,(1985), Biochem. J. 203. 699–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., Sundaram, T.K., Kernick, M., Wilkinson, A.E., (1982), Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 708, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krause, S., Kroner, K.H. & Deckwer, W.D. Comparison of affinity membranes and conventional affinity matrices with regard to protein purification. Biotechnol Tech 5, 199–204 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152781

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152781

Keywords

Navigation