Advertisement

Biotechnology Techniques

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 385–390 | Cite as

A simple method for conducting laboratory treatability studies to assess potential for In situ bioremediation

  • Richard J. Watts
  • Patrick N. McGuire
  • Ronald E. Hoeppel
Article
  • 24 Downloads

Summary

A simple, sealed flask system for conducting laboratory treatability studies to assess potential for in situ bioremediation was developed, evaluated, and compared to treatability studies which were open to the atmosphere. The treatability studies were conducted in 40 ml volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials fitted with Teflon septum caps. Contaminant loss was significantly less in the sealed-flasks relative to systems open to the atmosphere.

Keywords

Atmosphere Organic Analysis Laboratory Treatability Seal Flask Teflon Septum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. APHA (1989). Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Brubaker, G.R., and E. O'Neill. (1985). Remediation strategies using enhanced bioreclamation. In: Proceedings of the Fifth National Symposium and Exposition on Aquifer Restoration and Groundwater Monitoring. May 21–24, 1985. Columbus, OH. pp. 505–509.Google Scholar
  3. JRB Associates. (1982). Handbook of remedial actions at waste disposal sites. EPA- 625/6- 82–006. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
  4. Lee, M.D., Thomas, J.M., Borden, R.C., Bedient, P.B., Ward, C.H., and Wilson, J.T. (1988). CRC Critical Rev. Environ. Contr. 18, 29–89.Google Scholar
  5. Nyer, E.K. (1985). Groundwater treatment technology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Raymond, R.L., Jamison, V.W., Hudson, J.O., Mitchell, R.E., and Farmer, V.F. (1978). Field application of subsurface biodegradation of gasoline in a sand formation. American Petroleum Institute. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  7. Skow, K.M. (1982). Rate of biodegradation. In: Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods, W.J. Lyman et al., eds. pp. 9–1 - 9–85. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Trevors, J.T. (1984). Soil Biol. Biochem. 16, 525–526.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall, London 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard J. Watts
    • 1
  • Patrick N. McGuire
    • 2
  • Ronald E. Hoeppel
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.Blasland & Bauck Engineers, P.C.SyracuseUSA
  3. 3.Environmental Protection DivisionNaval Civil Engineering LaboratoryPort HuenemeUSA

Personalised recommendations