Abstract
Several laboratory experiments on magnetic field line reconnection are briefly reviewed. Emphasis is placed on the double inverse pinch device (DIPD) in which magnetic flux is built up during a quiescent reconnection phase and then abruptly transferred during an impulsive reconnection phase. Scaling estimates show that this impulsive phase corresponds to a solar release of 1030 ergs in 102 seconds with the production of GeV potentials. The trigger for the impulsive “flare” is a conduction mode instability (ion-acoustic) which abruptly changes the resistance of the neutral point region when the reconnection current density reaches a critical value.
Some results are presented from another reconnection device which has exactly antiparallel fields at the boundaries. This flat plate device develops one x-type neutral point rather than tearing into many neutral points. The reconnection rate is more quiescent than in the DIPD. A mild conduction mode instability occurs. The results suggest that regions with “flattened” boundary fields may not be as conducive to flares as regions with more curved fields.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnes, C. W. and Sturrock, P. A.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 174, 659.
Baum, P. J., Bratenahl, A., and White, R. S.: 1973a, Phys. Fluids 16, 226.
Baum, P. J., Bratenahl, A., Kao, M., and White, R. S.: 1973b, Phys. Fluids 16, 1501.
Baum, P. J., Bratenahl, A., and White, R. S.: 1973c, Radio Science 8, 917.
Baum, P. J. and Bratenahl, A.: 1974, Phys. Fluids 17, 1232.
Bratenahl, A.: 1971, “Experimental Studies of the Reconnection Process”, invited review, presented at the AGU Symposium, “The Geomagnetic Tail: Dynamics and Topology”, San Franciso, December 8, 1971.
Bratenahl, A. and Baum, P. J.: 1976a, this issue, following paper.
Bratenahl, A. and Baum, P. J.: 1976b, ‘Impulsive Flux Transfer Events and Solar Flares’, Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. (in press).
Bratenahl, A. and Yeates, C.: 1970, Phys. Fluids 13, 2696.
Bruzek, A.: 1967, in Solar Physics, ed. Xanthakis, Interscience, p. 399.
Howard, R. and Severny, A. B.: 1963, Astrophys. J. 137, 1242.
Meyer, P., Parker, E. N., and Simpson, J. A.: 1956, Phys. Rev., Second Series, 104, 768.
Ohyabu, N., Okamura, S., and Kawashima, N.: 1974, Phys. Fluids 17, 2009.
Overskei, D. and Politzer, P.: 1975, To be published in Phys. Fluids.
Petschek, H. E.: 1964, in W. N. Hess (ed.), The Physics of Solar Flares, NASA SP-50, p. 425.
Smith, D. F., and Priest, E. R.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 176, 487.
Sonnerup, B. U. O.: 1973, in R. Ramaty and R. G. Stone (eds.), High Energy Phenomena on the Sun, NASA SP-342, p. 357.
Syrovatskii, S. I., Frank, A. G. and Khodzhaev, A. Z.: 1972, JETP Lett. 15, 94.
Syrovatskii, S. I.: 1974, Proceedings of the P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute 74, 1. To be translated by Consultant's Bureau.
Vasyliunas, V. M.: 1975, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 13, 303.
Zvereva, A. M. and Severny, A. B.: 1970, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 41–42, 97.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baum, P.J., Bratenahl, A. Laboratory solar flare experiments. Sol Phys 47, 331–344 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152272
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152272