Conclusion
This article has shown how measures of economic in equality and the notion of “status scores” can be used to derive corresponding measures of social mobility based upon social mobility matrices. It would be interesting to investigate other areas of overlap between measures of economic inequality and of social mobility e.g. the axiomatic approach (Bibby, 1975b).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bibby J. (1975a). “Methods of measuring mobility”, Quality and Quantity 9: 107–136.
Bibby, J. (1975b). “Some recent work on social mobility tables”. Mimeo, 30 pp. Presented to the SSRC Seminar on Occupational Mobility, Aberdeen, 5th–9th September, 1975.
Glass D.V. (ed.) (1954). Social mobility in Britain. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Prais S.J. (1955a). “Measuring social mobility”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A118: 56–66
Prais S.J. (1955b). “The formal theory of social mobility”, Population Studies 9: 72–81.
Sen A.K. (1973). On Economic Inequality: The Radcliffe Lectures delivered in the University of Warwick, 1972, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Svalastoga K. (1959). Prestige, Class and Mobility. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
Svalastoga K. and Rishój T. (1965). “Social mobility: the Western European model”, Acta Sociologica 9: 175–182.
Svalastoga K. and Rishøj T. (1970). “Western European mobility”, American Journal of Sociology 76: 520–523.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bibby, J. Measures of social mobility based on income inequality measures. Qual Quant 14, 619–633 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152106
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152106