Abstract
We have calculated the 2.2 MeV gamma-ray line intensity from the Sun using a Monte Carlo method for neutron propagation in the solar atmosphere. We provide detailed results on the total gamma-ray yield per neutron and on the time profile of the 2.2 MeV line from an instantaneous and monoenergetic neutron source. The parameters which have the most significant effects on the line intensity are the energies of the neutrons, the position of the neutron source on the Sun, and the abundance of He3 in the photosphere. For an isotropic neutron source which is not too close to the limb of the Sun, the gamma-ray yield is between about 0.02 to 0.2 photons per neutron, provided that the neutron energies are in the range 1 to 100 MeV and the ratio He3/H is less than about 5 × 10−5.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, C. W.: 1963, Astrophysical Quantities, Athlone Press, London.
Chupp, E. L., Forrest, D. J., Higbie, P. R., Suri, A. N., Tsai, C., and Dunphy, P. D.: 1973, Nature 241, 333.
Geiss, J. and Reeves, H.: 1972, Astron. Astrophys. 18, 126.
Hughes, D. J. and Schwartz, R. B.: 1958, Neutron Cross Sections, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York.
King, L. D. P. and Goldstein, L.: 1949, Phys. Rev. 75, 1302.
Lingenfelter, R. E. and Ramaty, R.: 1967, in B. S. P. Shen (ed.), High Energy Nuclear Reactions in Astrophysics, W. A. Benjamin, New York, p. 99.
Lingenfelter, R. E., Flamm, E. J., Canfield, E. H., and Kellman, S.: 1965, J. Geophys. Res. 70, 4077.
Ramaty, R. and Lingenfelter, R. E.: 1973, in R. Ramaty and R. G. Stone (eds.), High Energy Phenomena on the Sun, Symposium Proceedings, NASA SP-342, p. 301.
Reppin, C., Chupp, E. L., Forrest, D. J., and Suri, A. N.: 1973, Conference Papers, 13th International Cosmic Ray Conference, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, p. 1577.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H.T., Ramaty, R. Neutron propagation and 2.2 MeV gamma-ray line production in the solar atmosphere. Sol Phys 36, 129–137 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00151553
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00151553