Solar Physics

, Volume 74, Issue 1, pp 21–34 | Cite as

Solar interior structure and luminosity variations

  • D. O. Gough
The Sun:Structure Oscillations, Magnetic Cycle, Surface Variations

Abstract

The assumptions of standard solar evolution theory are mentioned briefly, and the principle conclusions drawn from them are described. The result is a rationalization of the present luminosity and radius of the Sun. Because there is some uncertainty about the interior composition of the Sun, a range of models is apparently acceptable.

To decide which model is the most accurate, other more sensitive comparisons with observations must be made. Recent measurements of frequencies of dynamical oscillations are particularly valuable in this respect. The most accurate observations are of the five-minute oscillations, which suggest that the solar composition is not atypical of other stars of the same age as the Sun.

The theory predicts that the solar luminosity has risen steadily from about 70% of its current value during the last 4.7 x 109yr. Superposed on this there might have been variations on shorter timescales. Variations lasting about 107yr and occurring at intervals of 108yr have been suggested as being the cause of terrestrial ice ages. Moreover, there may be other variations, associated with instabilities arising from the coupling between the convection zone and the radiative interior, that occur on a timescale of 105yr and which also have climatic consequences. These issues are quite uncertain.

We do know that the Sun varies magnetically with a period of about 22 yr, and that this oscillation is modulated irregularly on a timescale of centuries. This appears to be a phenomenon associated with the convection zone and its immediate neighbourhood, though control from a more deeply-seated mechanism is not out of the question. There is a small luminosity variation associated with this cycle, and the way by which this might come about is discussed in terms of certain theories of the solar dynamo.

Finally, there must be small surface flux variations associated with the dynamical oscillations mentioned above. Though the total luminosity variations are extremely small, the flux in any specific direction, and in particular that of the earth, may be measurable.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bahcall, J. N.: 1979, Space Sci. Rev. 24, 227.Google Scholar
  2. Bahcall, J. N., Huebner, W. F., Lubow, S. H., Magee Jr, N. H., Merts, A. L., Parker, P. D., Rozsnya, B., Ulrich, R. K., and Argo, M. F.: 1980, Phys. Rev. Letters 45, 945.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, J. A., Sargent III, H. H., and Tyron, P. V.: 1980, in J. A. Eddy, R. O. Pepin, and R. B. Merrill (eds.), Proc. Conference on the Ancient Sun, Pergamon, London, p. 159.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, P. R.: 1981, in S. Sofia (ed.), Proc. Workshop on Solar Constant Variations, NASA, Greenbelt, in press.Google Scholar
  5. Berthomieu, G., Cooper, A. J., Gough, D. O., Osaki, Y., Provost, J., and Rocca, A.: 1980, in H. A. Hill and W. A. Dziembowski (eds.), Nonradial and Nonlinear Stellar Pulsation, Springer, Heidelberg, p. 307.Google Scholar
  6. Christensen-Dalgaard, J. and Gough, D. O.: 1980, Nature 288, 544.Google Scholar
  7. Claverie, A., Isaak, G. R., McLeod, C. P., van der Raay, H. B., and Roca-Cortes, T.: 1979, Nature 282, 591.Google Scholar
  8. Cowling, T. G.: 1953, in G. P. Kuiper (ed.), The Sun, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 565.Google Scholar
  9. Davis Jr, R.: 1978, in G. Friedlander (ed.), Proc. Informal Conf, on Status and Future of Solar Neutrino Research, Brookhaven Nat. Lab. 50879, Upton Vol. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
  10. Dearborn, D. S. P. and Blake, J. B.: 1980, Astrophys. J. 237, 616.Google Scholar
  11. Dearborn, D. S. P. and Newman, M. J.: 1978, Science 201, 150.Google Scholar
  12. Deubner, F.-L.: 1975, Astron. Astrophys. 44, 371.Google Scholar
  13. Deubner, F.-L., Ulrich, R. K., and Rhodes Jr, E. J.: 1979, Astron. Astrophys. 72, 177.Google Scholar
  14. Dicke, R. H.: 1978, Nature 276, 676.Google Scholar
  15. Dicke, R. H.: 1979a, New Scientist 83, 12.Google Scholar
  16. Dicke, R. H.: 1979b, Nature 280, 24.Google Scholar
  17. Drobyshevski, E. M. and Yuferev, V. S.: 1974, J. Fluid Mech. 65, 33.Google Scholar
  18. Eddy, J. A. and Boornazian, A. A.: 1979, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 11, 437.Google Scholar
  19. Epstein, S. and Yapp, C. J.: 1976, Earth Planet. Sci. Letters 30, 252.Google Scholar
  20. Fossat, E., Grec, G., and Pomerantz, M.: 1981, Solar Phys. 74, 59 (this volume).Google Scholar
  21. Gough, D. O.: 1978, in J. Rösch (ed.), Pleins feux sur la physique solaire, CNRS, Paris, p. 81.Google Scholar
  22. Gough, D. O.: 1980, in H. A. Hill and W. A. Dziembowski (eds.), Nonradial and Nonlinear Stellar Pulsation, Springer, Heidelberg, p. 273.Google Scholar
  23. Gough, D. O.: 1981, in S. Sofia (ed.), Proc. Workshop on Solar Constant Variations, NASA, Greenbelt, in press.Google Scholar
  24. Grec, G., Fossat, E., and Pomerantz, M.: 1980, Nature 288, 541.Google Scholar
  25. Joss, P. C.: 1974, Astrophys. J. 191, 771.Google Scholar
  26. Lubow, S., Rhodes, Jr, E. J., and Ulrich, R. K.: 1980, in H. A. Hill and W. A. Dziembowski (eds.), Nonradial and Nonlinear Stellar Pulsation, Springer, Heidelberg, p. 300.Google Scholar
  27. Mitchell Jr, J. M., Stockton, C. W., and Meko, D. M.: 1979, in B. M. McCormac and T. A. Seliga, (eds.), Solar-Terrestrial Influences on Weather and Climate, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, p. 125.Google Scholar
  28. Newkirk Jr, G.: 1980, J. A. Eddy, R. O. Pepin, and R. B. Merrill (eds.), Proc. Conference on the Ancient Sun, Pergamon, London, p. 293.Google Scholar
  29. Parker, E. N.: 1979, Cosmical Magnetic Fields, Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  30. Reines, F., Sobel, H., and Pasier, B. E.: 1980, Phys. Rev. Letters, 45, 1307.Google Scholar
  31. Ross, J. E. and Aller, L. H.: 1976, Science 191, 1223.Google Scholar
  32. Rosenwald, R. D. and Hill, H. A.: 1980, in H. A. Hill and W. A. Dziembowski (eds.), Nonradial and Nonlinear Stellar Pulsation, Springer, Heidelberg, p. 404.Google Scholar
  33. Shapiro, I. I.: 1980, Science 208, 51.Google Scholar
  34. Sofia, S., O'Keefe, J., and Lesh, J. R.: 1979, Science 204, 1306.Google Scholar
  35. Sofia, S., Dunham, D. W., and Fiala, A. D.: 1980, in J. A. Eddy, R. O. Pepin, and R. B. Merrill (eds.), Proc. Conference on the Ancient Sun, Pergamon, London, p. 147.Google Scholar
  36. Spiegel, E. A. and Weiss, N. O.: 1980, Nature 287, 616.Google Scholar
  37. Stix, M.: 1981, Solar Phys. 74, 79 (this volume).Google Scholar
  38. Waldmeier, M.: 1961, The Sunspot-Activity in the Years 1610–1960, Schulthess, Zürich.Google Scholar
  39. Weiss, N. O. 1966, Proc. Roy. Soc. A293, 310.Google Scholar
  40. Wittmann, A.: 1980, Solar Phys. 66, 223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. O. Gough
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Astronomy, and Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of CambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations