Transportation

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 323–345

Consequences of public ownership and subsidies for mass transit: Evidence from case studies and regression analysis

  • John Pucher
  • Anders Markstedt

Abstract

The trend toward public ownership, public regulation, and public subsidization of the U.S. transit industry has recently come under attack. Many argue that the result has been reduced productivity, increased costs, and very little real benefit. This article examines the impacts of subsidies and public ownership in four large transit systems that cover a range of transit system types and financing arrangements. Evidence from the case studies is compared to the results of both time-series and cross-section regression analysis of operating and financial statistics for large samples of bus systems. Although the case studies and the regressions rely on different datasets and different techniques, they support the same conclusions. Increased subsidies and public ownership have kept down fares and permitted service expansion, but have also encouraged wasteful cost escalation. Thus, transit riders unquestionably have benefited from public takeovers of transit systems and burgeoning subsidies, but not nearly as much as they would have benefited if costs had not skyrocketed at the same time.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altshuler, A., Womack, J. and Pucher, J. (1981). The Urban Transportation System: Politics and Policy Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. American Public Transit Association (1971). 1970 Transit Operating Report. Washington, DC: American Public Transit Association.Google Scholar
  3. American Public Transit Association (1977). 1975 Transit Operating Report. Washington, DC: American Public Transit Association.Google Scholar
  4. American Public Transit Association (1981a). Transit Fact Book. Washington, DC: American Public Transit Association.Google Scholar
  5. American Public Transit Association (1981b). Expense Recovery Ratios: Transit System Revenues and Expenses. Washington, DC: American Public Transit Association.Google Scholar
  6. American Public Transit Association (1981c). Operating Statistics Report. Washington, DC: American Public Transit Association.Google Scholar
  7. Barnum, D. and Gleason, J. (1979). Measuring the Influence of Subsidies on Transit Efficiency and Effectiveness. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
  8. Bly, P. H., Webster, F. W. and Pounds, S. (1980). “Effects of Subsidies on Urban Public Transport”, Transportation 9: 311–331.Google Scholar
  9. Bonnell, J. (1981). “Transit's Growing Fiscal Crisis”, Traffic Quarterly 35: 541–556.Google Scholar
  10. Executive Office of the President (1981). Fiscal Year 1982 Budget Revisions: Additional Details on Budget Savings. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  11. Hilton, G. (1974). Federal Transit Subsidies, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Lee, N. and Steedman, I. (1970). “Economies of Scale in Bus Transportation”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 4: 15–28.Google Scholar
  13. Meyer, J. and Gomez-Ibanez, J. (1981). Autos, Transit, and Cities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, D. (1970). “Differences Among Cities, Differences Among Firms, and Costs of Urban Bus Transport,” Journal of Industrial Economics 19: 22–32.Google Scholar
  15. Mohring, H. (1972). “Optimization and Scale Economies in Urban Bus Transportation”, American Economic Review 60: 591–604.Google Scholar
  16. Nelson, G. (1972). An Econometric Model of Urban Bus Operations. Washington, DC: Institute for Defense Analyses.Google Scholar
  17. Ortner, J. and Wachs, M. (1979). “The Cost-Revenue Squeeze in American Public Transit”, Journal of the American Planning Association January: 10–21.Google Scholar
  18. Pashigian, B. (1976). “Consequences and Causes of Public Ownership of Urban Transit Facilities”, Journal of Political Economy 84: 1239–1259.Google Scholar
  19. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co. (1980). Study of Operator Absenteeism and Workers' Compensation Trends in the Urban Mass Transportation Industry. Report prepared for the Urban Mass Transportation Administration. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
  20. Pucher, J. (1982). “A Decade of Change for Mass Transit”, Transportation Research Record 858, November: 48–57.Google Scholar
  21. Pucher, J., Markstedt, A. and Hirschman, I. (1983). “Impacts of Subsidies on the Costs of Urban Public Transport”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy May: in press.Google Scholar
  22. Sale, J. and Green, B. (1979). “Operating Costs and Performance of American Public Transit Systems”, Journal of the American Planning Association January: 22–27.Google Scholar
  23. Tye, W. (1974). “Economics of Urban Transit Capital Grants”, Highway Research Record No. 476.Google Scholar
  24. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis (1971). Survey of Current Business. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, July, p. S-15.Google Scholar
  25. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis (1981). Survey of Current Business. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, July, p. S-14.Google Scholar
  26. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (1981). Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  27. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (1971). Employment and Earnings 18: 94–97.Google Scholar
  28. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (1976). Employment and Earnings 23: 112–116.Google Scholar
  29. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (1981). Employment and Earnings 28: 149–153.Google Scholar
  30. U.S. House of Representatives (1981). The Financial and Productivity Problems of Urban Public Transportation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  31. U.S. House of Representatives (1982). The State of Public Transportation in the Nation and a Recommended New Block Grant Concept. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  32. Wabe, J. and Coles, O. (1975). “The Long-and Short-run Costs of Bus Transport in Urban Areas,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy May: 127–140.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Pucher
    • 1
  • Anders Markstedt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Urban PlanningRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations