Skip to main content
Log in

A cognitive model for the evaluation of units of instruction

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes an approach to the problem of how particular pre-existing systems of cognitive structures in individuals could be brought to bear on the design and evaluation of an instructional unit. The paper takes the understanding and active use of spatial prepositions as an example of a general instructional goal, and (1) analyzes cognitive systems involved in different uses of prepositions, introducing natural units called “components”; (2) discusses in detail how pre-existing sensorymotor and conceptual knowledge is related to the instructional situation in order to build the desired components naturally; and (3) cites existing psychological research illustrating how research can be used to discover the types of components to look for in individuals.

The example, thus worked out in detail, serves to demonstrate the relevance of specific pre-existing cognitive structures which most instructional theory and practice neglects. It also illustrates the heuristic value for evaluating and designing instructional procedures of inventing structures to account for organized aspects of human behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, L. B. and Learned, J. (1948). “The Development of Verbalized Space in the Young Child.” Journal of Genetic Psychology 72: 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauersfeld, H. (1967). Die Grundlegung und Vorbereitung geometrischen Denkens in der Grundschule. Freiburg: Herder-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1963). The Process of Education, New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussis, A. M. (1968). “Children's Understanding of Basic Language Structure.” In Cognitive Growth in the Preschool, Research Monograph, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, (June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. V. (1972). “Some Perceptual Factors in the Acquisition of Locative Terms by Young Children.” In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, April 14–16.

  • Davis, Robert B. (1963). “The Evolution of School Mathematics.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1: 260–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley, J. A., Jr. and Witz, K. (1971). “Individualized Instruction: Some Observations from the Ivory Tower.” Educational Technology March.

  • Elkind, D. (1961). “Children's Conceptions of Right and Left.” Journal of Genetic Psychology. 99: 269–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, J. R. (1968). Selected Papers of J. R. Firth, 1952–59. F. R. Palmer (Ed.) Indiana University Press.

  • Ervin-Tripp, S. (1970). “Discourse Agreement: How Children Answer Questions.” In Cognition and the Development of Language, John R.Hayes (Ed.), New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1965). Conditions of Learning, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesell, A. (1940). The First Five Years of Life. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1965). Training Research and Education, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. M., Smith, J. H. and Laufer, B. (1972). “Communication and the Beginning of Language. The Development of Semantic Structure in one-word speech and Beyond.” Draft, Harvard University; to be published by Academic Press.

  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1973. “Early Language Learning: A Sociolinguistic Apporach.” Paper prepared for the IXth International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, Chicago, August-September.

  • Harris, J. L. and Strommen, E. A. (1972). “The Role of Front-Back Features in Children's ‘Front,’ ‘Back,’ and ‘Beside’ Placements of objects.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. May: 259–271.

  • Howard, I. P. and Templeton, W. B. (1966). Human Spatial Orientation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J. (1967). “Discrimination of Figure Orientation.” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 63, 2: 359–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J. and Presson, C. C. (1973). “Mental Rotation and the Perspective Problem.” Cognitive Psychology, 4: 277–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J. and Strauss, S. (1968). “Comprehension and a Statements Relation to the Situation It Describes.” Journal Verb. Learn. and Verb. Behavior. 7: 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R. (1965). “The Science Curriculum Improvement Study.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching. October.

  • Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative Activity of the Brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Morris M. (1936). Infant Speech; A Study of the Beginning of Language. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Col. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1961). The Role of Speech in the Regulation of Normal and Abnormal Behavior. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B., (1923). “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages,” supplement to Ogden and Richards' The Meaning of Meaning. New York: Harcourt, 10th edition, 1966, pp. 296–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1926). The Language and Thought of the Child. M. Gabain (trans.). New York: Harcourt and Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1928). Judgement and Reasoning in the Child. M. Warden (trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1929). The Child's Conception of the World. J. and M. Tomlinson (trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. M. Cook (trans.). New York: W. W. Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1967). The Child's Conception of Space. F. J. Langdon and J. L. Lunzer (trans.). New York: W. W. Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. (1971). Mental Imagery in the Child. P. A Chilton (trans.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, J. M. (1973). Structural Learning I: Theory and Research. New York: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreibner, F. R. (1956). Your Child's Speech. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair-de Zwart, H. (1967). Language et operations: Sous-systèmes linguistiques et operations concrètes. Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, C. J. and Stern, W. L. (1928). “Die Kindes Sprache.” Monographien uber die seelische Entwicklung des Kindes. Leipzig: Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. E.Hanfman and G.Vakar (Eds.), trans. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, A. F. (1944). The Language and Mental Development of Children. London: George G. Harrap and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witz, K. G. (1970). “Representation of Cognitive Processes and Cognitive Structures in Children I. Archives de Psychologie. 40: 61–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witz, K. G. (1973). “Analysis of ‘Frameworks’ in Young Children.” Journal of Children's Mathematical Behavior. (University of Illinois Curriculum Laboratory) 1 (No. 2), 44–66.

  • Witz, K. G. and Easley, J. A. Jr. (1972). “Analysis of Cognitive Behavior in Children.” Final Report, Grant No. OEC-0-70-2142(508), USDHEW, NCERD.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Witz, K.G., Goodwin, D.R. & Easley, J.A. A cognitive model for the evaluation of units of instruction. Instr Sci 3, 307–326 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00150478

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00150478

Keywords

Navigation