Skip to main content
Log in

Flexible long range planning using low cost information

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contemporary transport planning requires a flexible modelling approach which can be used to monitor the implementation of a long term plan checking regularly its short term performance with easily available data; the original model is periodically updated using low cost information and this allows the evaluation of the changes to the plan which may be required. Such an approach requires models suited to regular updating and to the use of data from different sources. Models to update trip matrices from traffic counts have been available for some time; however, the estimation and/or updating of other model stages with low cost data has escaped analytical treatment. The paper discusses this idea and formulates the updating problem for an example involving a joint destination/mode choice model under various assumptions about the nature of the available data. Analytical solutions are proposed as well as some general conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates JJ (1988) Econometric issues in stated preference analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy XXII(1): 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben Akiva ME & Bolduc D (1987) Approaches to model transferability and updating: the combined transfer estimator. Transportation Research Record 1139:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben Akiva ME & Morikawa T (1990) Estimation of travel demand models from multiple sources. Proceedings, 11th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Yokohama, Japan.

  • Bradley M (1988) Realism and adaptation in designing hypothetical travel choice concepts. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy XXII(1): 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley M & Kroes E (1990) Simultaneous analysis of stated preference and revealed preference information. Proceedings 18th PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, University of Sussex, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascetta E & Nguyen S (1988) A unified framework for estimating or updating origin/destination matrices from traffic counts. Transportation Research 22B(6):437–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman RG & Staelin R (1982) Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. Journal of Marketing Research XIX(3): 288–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cea J, Ortúzar J de Dios & Willumsen LG (1986) Evaluating marginal improvements to a transport network: An application to the Santiago underground. Transportation 13(3): 211–233

    Google Scholar 

  • ESTRAUS (1989) Estudio estratégico de transporte del Gran Santiago. Informe Final a la Secretaría Ejecutiva de la Comisión de Transporte Urbano, Consorcio SIGDOKOPPERS-CIS, Santiago.

  • Fowkes AS & Wardman M (1988) The design of stated preference travel choice experiments, with special reference to interpersonal taste variations. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy XXII(1): 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn HF, Ben Akiva ME & Bradley MA (1985) Tests of the scaling approach to transferring disaggregate travel demand models. Transportation Research Record 1037: 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn HF & Pol H (1985) Model transferability: the potential for increasing cost-effectiveness. International Conference on Travel Behaviour, Noordwijk, April 1985, The Netherlands.

  • Kocur GT, Adler T, Hyman W & Aunet B (1982) Guide to forecasting travel demand with direct utility assessment. Report N° UMTA-NH-11–0001–82, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppelman FS, Kuah G-K & Rose G (1985) Transfer model updating with aggregate data. 64th Annual TRB Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January 1985, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppelman FS, Kuah G-K & Wilmot CG (1985) Transfer model updating using disaggregate data. Transportation Research Record 1037: 102–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louviere JJ (1988) Conjoint analysis modelling of stated preferences: A review of theory, methods, recent developments and external validity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy XXII(1): 93–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinder IH & Evans SE (1981) The predictive accuracy of British transport studies in urban areas. Supplementary Report SR 699, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortúzar J de Dios (1980) Mixed-mode demand forecasting techniques. Transportation Planning and Technology 6(2): 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1982) Fundamentals of discrete multimodal choice modelling. Transport Reviews 2(1): 47–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1986) The cultural and temporal transferability of discrete choice disaggregate model split models. Proceedings IV World Conference on Transport Research, University of British Columbia, May 1986, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1989) Estimation of trip matrices and mode choice models integrating flow information and other data types. Technical Note, Transport Studies Group, University College London.

  • Ortúzar J de Dios & Ivelic AM (1988) Influencia de nivel de agregación de los datos en la estimación de modelos logit de elección discreta. Actas del V Congresco Panamericano de Ingeniería de Tránsito y Transporte, Universidad de Puerto Rico en Mayagüez, July 1988, Puerto Rico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortúzar J de Dios & Willumsen LG (1990) Modelling Transport. London: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearmain D & Kroes E (1990) Stated Preference Techniques: A Guide to Practice. Steer Davies Gleave and Hague Consulting Group, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • SDG (1990) Game-Generator, User Manual. Steer Davies Gleave, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steer J & Willumsen LG (1983) An investigation of passenger preference structures. In: Carpenter & Jones (eds) Recent Advances in Travel Demand Analysis (pp 423–433). Gower Press.

  • Tamin OZ & Willumsen LG (1989) Transport demand model estimation from traffic counts. Transportation 16(1): 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams HCWL & Ortúzar J de Dios (1982) Travel demand and response analysis: some integrating themes. Transportation Research 16A(5/6): 345–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willumsen LG (1981) Simplified transport demand models based on traffic counts. Transportation 10(3): 257–278.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

requests for offprints

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Dios Ortúzar, J., Willumsen, L.G. Flexible long range planning using low cost information. Transportation 18, 151–173 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00150470

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00150470

Key words

Navigation