Skip to main content
Log in

The nature, content and interpractice variation of general practice: A regional study in Italy

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The activity of 34 general practitioners (GP) working in solo practices in six Local Health Units were assessed, as a preliminary step of a main study, to evaluate and possibly improve the quality of GP professional performance using peer review and feed-back information. A wide interpractice variation was observed in patient visit and patient visiting rates, drug and test prescribing, in- and out-patient referrals, as well as in the composition of the practice case-mix. The extent of interpractice variation for relevant actions in the process of care was unchanged after adjusting for case-mix, suggesting that case-mix differences have little effect in explaining differences among physicians' overall pattern of care and health care resource consumptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hartley R.M., CharltonJ.R., HarrisC.M. and JarmanB. (1984): Influence of patient characteristics on test ordering in general practice. - Br. Med. J. 289: 735–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. HartleyR.M., CharltonJ.R., HarrisC.M. and JarmanB. (1987): Patterns of physicians' use of medical resources in ambulatory settings. - Am. J. Public Health 77: 565–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Internal Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care (ICHPPC - 2 - Defined) (1983): Third edition. -London, Oxford Univ. Press.

  4. KessnerD.M., KalkC.E., SingerJ. (1973): Assessing health quality: the case for tracers. - N. Eng. J. Med. 288: 189–94.

    Google Scholar 

  5. MetcalfeD.Variations in process of primary care. In:PendletonD., SchofieldT. and MarinkerM. (1986): In: Pursuit of quality. Approaches to performance review in general practice. - London, Royal College of General Practitioners, (pg. 96–110).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nordic Statistics on Medicines (1987): Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification (ATC). Uppsala.

  7. SchneeweissR., RosenblattR.A., CherkinC.D., KirkwoodR.C. and HartG. (1983): Diagnosis Clusters: a new tool for analyzing the content of ambulatory medical care. - Med. Care 21: 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  8. TaroniF. and TraversaG. Educational implications of quality of care evaluation in general practice: antibiotic prescribing in sore throat. In: Duru G., Engelbrecht R., Flagle C.D., Van Eimeren W. System Science in health care (1988): Paris, Masson (pg. 459–61).

    Google Scholar 

  9. WilkinD. and MetcalfeD.H.M. (1984): List size and patient contact in general medical practice. - Br. Med. J. 289: 1501–02.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taroni, F., Siass, R., Traversa, G. et al. The nature, content and interpractice variation of general practice: A regional study in Italy. Eur J Epidemiol 6, 313–318 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00150439

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00150439

Key words

Navigation