Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Punishment as language: Misleading analogy for desert theorists

  • Published:
Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology, 60616, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

    Michael Davis

Authors
  1. Michael Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

I should like to thank Anthony Duff, Igor Primoratz, and Don Scheid for helpful comments on one or another early draft of this paper. I should also like to thank those who discussed the penultimate draft at a sessio of the Mid-western Division Meeting, American Philosophical Association, 27 April 1991, especially Jacob Adler, my official commentator, for helping to give the paper its final polish (without polishing it off).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, M. Punishment as language: Misleading analogy for desert theorists. Law Philos 10, 311–322 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149800

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149800

Search

Navigation