Abstract
There are at least two frameworks within which the debate on proper institutional arrangements for regulation can be carried out. One rests on seeing the various possibilities as instruments and its central concern is with the most efficient means for achieving regulatory objectives. The second framework views regulation as an essentially political act. It focuses on adapting our choice of institutional alternatives to take account of valued features of our existing political world. It also involves an understanding of how our choice of institutional alternatives actively shapes that world and thus helps to form our regime or the way of life to which we aspire. These two frameworks are examined with special attention being given to the political view.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Bar Association, Commission of Law and the Economy (1979). Federal Regulation: Roads to Reform.
Aristotle, Ethics.
Arrow, Kenneth (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Barber, Sotirios A. (1984). On what the Constitution Means. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
Bardach, Eugene and Kagan, Robert A. (1982). Going By the Book. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Barry, Brian (1965). Political Argument. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bobbitt, Philip (1982). Constitutional Fate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Buchanan, James M. (1979). “Is economics the science of choice?” in J. M. Buchanan (ed.), What Should Economists Do? Indianapolis: Liberty Press.
Coleman, Jules L. (1984). “Economics and the law: a critical review of the foundations of the economic approach to law,” Ethics 94: 649–679.
Cornell, Nina W., Noll, Roger G., Weingast, Barry (1976). “Safety regulation,” in Henry Owen and Charles L. Schultze (eds.), Setting National Priorities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Cropsey, Joseph (1977). “The United States as regime and the sources of the American way of life,” in Robert H. Horowitz(ed.), The Moral Foundations of the American Republic. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Crozier, Michael (1964). The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dales, J. H. (1968). Pollution, Property and Prices. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Dasgupta, Partha, Sen, Amartya and Marglin, Stephen (1972). Guidelines for Project Evaluation. New York: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
Davis, Otto A. and Kamien, Morton J. (1970). “Externalities, information and alternative collective action,” in Robert Haveman and Julius Margolis (eds.), Public Expenditures and Policy Analysis. Chicago: Markham.
de Jouvenel, Bertrand (1969). “Efficiency and amenity,” in Kenneth Arrow and Tibor Scitovsky (eds.), Readings in Welfare Economics. London: Allen and Unwin.
Elkin, Stephen L. (1974). “Political science and the analysis of public policy,” Public Policy 22: 399–422.
Elkin, Stephen (1985). “Economic and political rationality,” Polity, Winter.
Esposito, John S. and Silverman, Larry (1970). Vanishing Air: Ralph Nader Study Group in Air Pollution. New York: Grossman.
Freeman, A. Myrick (1977). “Environmental management as a regulatory process,” Discussion Paper D-4, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Fuller, Lon (1981). The Principles of Social Order, edited and with an introduction by Kenneth I. Winston. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
Green, Mark (1972). The Closed Enterprise System. New York: Grossman.
Green, Mark and Waitzman, Norman (1979). Business War on the Law: An Analysis of the Benefits of Federal Health/ Safety Enforcement. Washington, DC: Corporate Accountability Research Group.
Goldberg, Victor P. (1976). “Regulation and administered contracts,” The Bell Journal of Economics 7(2): 426–448.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1973). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. I: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heritage Foundation. Agenda ‘83. Washington, DC.
Kelman, Steven (1981). What Price Incentives? Boston: Auburn House.
Kelly, George Armstrong (1979). “Who needs a theory of citizenship,” Daedalus 108(4): 21–36.
Kennedy, Duncan (1976). “Form and substance in private law adjudication,” Harvard Law Review 89: 1685–1778.
Levine, Robert A. (1972). Public Planning. New York: Norton.
Lindblom, Charles E. (1965). The Intelligence of Democracy. New York: Free Press.
Lowi, Theodore (1979). The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton.
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1981). After Virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacNeil, Ian R. (1974). “The many futures of contract,” Southern California Law Review 74: 691–816.
Macpherson, C. B. (1962). The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. New York: Oxford.
McKean, Roland N. (1970). “The role of analytical aids,” in Lewis Ganthrop (ed.), Administrative Process and Democratic Theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Miller, Stephen (1982). “The constitution and the spirit of commerce” in Robert A. Goldwin and William Schambra (eds.), How Capitalistic is the Constitution? Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
Mises, Ludwig von (1960). Epistemological Problems of Economics. Princeton: Van Nostrand.
MorsteinMarx, Fritz (1961). “Administrative regulation in comparative perspective,” Law and Contemporary Problems 26(2): 307–328.
Oakeshott, Michael (1962). “Rationalism in politics” in M. Oakeshott (ed.), Rationalism in Politics. New York: Methuen, 1962.
Posner, Richard (1977). Economic Analysis of Law, 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown.
Prest, A. R. and Turvey, Ralph (1968). “Cost-benefit analysis: a survey,” in American Economic Association and the Royal Economic Society, Surveys of Economic Theory: Resource Allocation. New York: St. Martin's.
Robbins, Lionel (1962). An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1973). “Effluent charges: a critique,” Canadian Journal of Economics 6(4): 512–528.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1977). “Market models for water pollution control: their strengths and weaknesses,” Public Policy 25: 383–406.
Russell, Clifford S. (1979). “What can we get from effluent charges,” Policy Analysis 5: 155–180.
Sammuelson, Paul A. (1965). Foundations of Economic Analysis. New York: Atheneum.
Schultze, Charles (1977). The Public Use of Private Interest. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Sen, Amartya K. (1970). Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs (1977). Study on Federal Regulation, 95th Congress, Committee Pring. 1
Shklar, Judith (1964). “Decisionism,” in Carl Friedrich (ed.), Rational Decision, Nomos VII. New York: Atherton.
Soble, Stephen (1977). “A proposal for the administrative compensation of victims of toxic substance pollution,” Harvard Journal of Legislation 14: 694–696.
Stewart, Richard B. (1975). “The reformation of American administrative law,” Harvard Law Review 88(8): 1671–1813.
Sullivan, Neil (1979). “Independent adjudication and occupational safety and health policy. A text for administrative court theory,” Administrative Law Review 31(2): 177–204.
Titmuss, Richard (1971). The Gift Relationship. New York: Pantheon.
Tribe, Lawrence H. (1972). “Policy science: analysis or ideology,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 2(1): 65–110.
Unger, Robeto (1975). Knowledge and Politics. New York: Free Press.
Vogel, David (1980/81). “Promoting pluralism: the public interest movement in the Americam reform tradition,” Political Science Quarterly 95(4): 607–627.
Walzer, Michael (1983). Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.
Weidenbaum, Murray L. (1975). “The new wave of government regulation of business,” American Enterprise Institute Reprint #37, Fed. 1975.
Wildavsky, Aaron (1979). “The self-evaluating organization,” in Speaking Truth to Power. Boston: Little, Brown.
Williams, Bernard (1973). “A critique of utilitarianism,” in J. J. C. Smart and Bernard Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism - For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williamson, Oliver P. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
Wolf, Charles Jr. (1979). “A theory of non-market failures,” The Public Interest 55: 114–133.
Zeckhauser, Richard and Nichols, Albert (1978). “The Occupational Safety and Health Administration,” Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, Study on Federal Regulation, Appendix to Vol. VI, 95th Congress, Committee Print.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elkin, S.L. Regulation as a political question. Policy Sci 18, 95–108 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149753
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149753