Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pitch angle scattering of solar particles: Comparison of ‘particle’ and ‘field’ approach

I. Strong scattering

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the quasi-linear theory of pitch angle scattering the power spectrum of magnetic field fluctuations is related to the shape of the pitch angle diffusion coefficient D(μ), the absolute value of the mean free path λ, and the rigidity dependence of the mean free path λ(R). We discuss these relations in detail during the solar particle event of 11 April, 1978 which was observed on HELIOS-2 at a distance of 0.49 AU from the Sun. Magnetic field measurements obtained during the time of the event are used as a basis for the ‘layer model’ in which the method of particle trajectories in an actually measured field is used to simulate pitch angle diffusion. The values of D(μ) and λ based on the trajectory simulation for 100 MeV protons (‘field’ approach) are compared with results obtained from solar proton data (‘particle’ approach) and with predictions from quasi-linear theory based on the additional assumption of the slab model for magnetic field fluctuations (‘QLT’ approach). The time of the event is characterized by a high level of field fluctuations, the observed mean free path of about 0.03 AU for 100 MeV protons is smaller than the average value near 1 AU. Results from the ‘field’ and ‘particle’ approaches agree surprisingly well. The remaining difference in the mean free path of about a factor of 2 could be due to tangential discontinuities which are measured by the magnetometer, but not seen by the real particles traveling along the average field. The results from the ‘field’ and ‘QLT’ approaches based on the same set of magnetic field measurements differ by about a factor of 4. One of the reasons for this discrepancy is that the conditions for resonance scattering are only marginally valid. In addition, the wave vectors representing Alfvén-type fluctuations may not be totally field aligned. This deviation from the slab model would cause an increase of the theoretically predicted mean free path and lead to better agreement with the other two approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bavassano, B. M., Dobrowolny, F., Mariani, F., and Ness, N. F.: 1982, J. Geophys. Res. 87, 3617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeck, J. and Wibberenz, G.: 1986, Astrophys. J. 311, 437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeck, J., Mason, G. M, Hamilton, D. C., Wibberenz, G., Kunow, H., Hovestadt, D., and Klecker, B.: 1987, Astrophys. J. 322, 1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, J. W., Earl, J. A., Green, G., Kunow, H., Müller-Mellin, R., and Wibberenz, G.: 1980, J. Geophys. Res. 85, 2313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, R. and Dobrowolny, M.: 1986, Ann. Geophys. 4, A-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, R., Bavassano, B., and Villante, U.: 1985, J. Geophys. Res. 90, 4373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchini, S., Moussas, X., and Quenby, J. J.: 1980, Astrophys. Space Sci. 69, 425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davila, J. M. and Scott, J. S.: 1984, Astrophys. J. 285, 400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denskat, K. U. and Burlaga, L. F.: 1977, J. Geophys. Res. 82, 2693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denskat, K. U. and Neubauer, F. M.: 1982, J. Geophys. Res. 87, 2215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, J. A.: 1976a, Astrophys. J. 205, 900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, J. A.: 1976b, Astrophys. J. 206, 301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, J. A.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 251, 739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, L. A. and Sari, J. W.: 1973, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 6729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, L. A., Goldstein, M. L., Klimas, A. J., and Sandri, G.: 1974, Astrophys. J. 190, 417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M. L.: 1976, Astrophys. J. 205, 900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M. L.: 1980, J. Geophys. Res. 85, 3033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M. L. and Matthaeus, W.: 1981, Proc. 17th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Paris 3, 294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombosi, T. and Owens, A. J.: 1979, Proc. 16th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Kyoto 3, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, G.: 1984, Habilitation thesis, University of Kiel.

  • Hasselmann, K. and Wibberenz, G.: 1968, Z. Geophys. 34, 353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselmann, K. and Wibberenz, G.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 162, 1049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. C: 1977, J. Geophys. Res. 82, 2157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokipii, J. R.: 1966, Astrophys. J. 146, 480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokipii, J. R.: 1971, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 97, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F. C., Kaiser, T. B., and Birmingham, T. J.: 1978, Phys. Fluids 21, 364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, T. B., Birmingham, T. J., and Jones, F. C: 1978, Phys. Fluids 21, 370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, M., Sakai, T., and Tamai, E.: 1981, Proc. 17th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Paris 3, 314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunstmann, J.: 1977, Dissertation, University of Hamburg.

  • Kunstmann, J.: 1979, Astrophys. J. 229, 812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. A. and Völk, H. J.: 1975, Astrophys. J. 198, 485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morfill, G.: 1975, J. Geophys. Res. 80, 1783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morfill, G., Völk, H. J., and Lee, M. A.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 5841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moussas, X. and Quenby, J. J.: 1978, Astrophys. Space Sci. 58, 483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moussas, X., Quenby, J. J., and Webb, S.: 1975, Proc. 14th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Munich 3, 866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moussas, X., Quenby, J. J., and Valdés-Galicia, J. F.: 1982a, Astrophys Space Sci. 86, 185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moussas, X., Quenby, J. J., and Valdés-Galicia, J. F.: 1982b, Astrophys Space Sci. 85, 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neustock, H. H., Wibberenz, G., and Iwers, B.: 1985, Proc. 19th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., La Jolla 4, 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, C. K.: 1986, Proc. 19th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., La Jolla 9, 251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, C. K., Wibberenz, G., Green, G., and Kunow, H.: 1983, Proc. 18th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf. 10, 381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, I. D.: 1982, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20, 335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1965, Planetary Space Sci. 13, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quenby, J. J.: 983, Space Sci. Rev. 34, 137.

  • Quenby, J. J. and Sear, J. F.: 1971, Planetary Space Sci. 19, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quenby, J. J., Balogh, A., Engel, A. R., Elliot, H., Hedgecock, P., Hynds, R. J., and Sear, J. F.: 1970, Acta Phys. Hung. 29, 445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelof, E. C.: 1969, in H. Ögelmann and J. R. Wayland (eds.), Lectures in High Energy Astrophysics, NASA SP-199, p. 111.

  • Sari, J. W. and Ness, N. F.: 1969, Solar Phys 8, 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlickeiser, R.: 1988, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 2725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, B. M., Richter, A. K., and Wibberenz, G.: 1977, Solar Phys 54, 207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés-Galicia, J. F., Moussas, X., Quenby, J. J., Neubauer, F. M., and Schwenn, R.: 1984, Solar Phys 91, 399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés-Galicia, J. F., Wibberenz, G., Quenby, J. J., Moussas, X., Green, G., and Neubauer, F. M.: 1987, Proc. 20th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Moscow 3, 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wibberenz, G., Hasselmann, K., and Hasselmann, D.: 1970, Acta Phys. Hung. 29, Suppl. 2, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wibberenz, G.: 1976, in D. J. Williams (ed.), Physics of Solar Planetary Environments, Boulder, Colorado, Vol. I, p. 346.

  • Zwickl, R. D. and Webber, W. R.: 1977, Solar Phys 54, 457.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Geofisica, UNAM, 04510, Coyoacan, D.F., Mexico

    J. F. Valdés-Galicia

  2. Institut für reine und angewandte Kernphysik, Universität Kiel, D-2300, Kiel, F.R.G.

    G. Wibberenz & G. Green

  3. The Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, SW7, London, England

    J. J. Quenby

  4. Astrophysics Laboratory, National University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, GR-15771, Athens, Greece

    X. Moussas

  5. Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie, Universität Köln, F.R.G.

    F. M. Neubauer

Authors
  1. J. F. Valdés-Galicia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Wibberenz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. J. Quenby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. X. Moussas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G. Green
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. F. M. Neubauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valdés-Galicia, J.F., Wibberenz, G., Quenby, J.J. et al. Pitch angle scattering of solar particles: Comparison of ‘particle’ and ‘field’ approach. Sol Phys 117, 135–156 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148578

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148578

Keywords

Search

Navigation