Abstract
New solar wind data from Helios-2 are used to study, in a statistical fashion, the relation between proton number density n, flow speed u and heliocentric distance r. It is shown that the average of nu 2 r 2 does not depend on flow speed nor on distance, verifying the previously established invariance of momentum flux density (mnu2) carried by the solar wind. Averages of mnu2 from different spacecraft do not show correlation with the solar cycle. Rather, the close agreement (to within 1.8%) of values from Helios-1 and Helios-2 suggests that the momentum flux density carried by the solar wind may be also constant during the solar cycle.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Edwards, A.: 1979, Multiple Regression and the Analysis of Variance and Covariance, Freeman, San Francisco.
Eyni, M. and Steinitz, R.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 243, 279.
Hedgecock, P. C.: 1975, Solar Phys. 42, 497.
Hundhausen, A. J., Bame, S. J., Asbridge, J. R., and Sydoriak, S. J.: 1970, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 4643.
Intriligator, D. S.: 1978, Astrophys. J. 221, 1009.
King, J. H.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 653.
King, J. H.: 1979, J. Geophys. Res. 84, 5938.
Marsch, E., Mühlhäuser, K.-H., Schwenn, R., Rosenbauer, H., Pilipp, W., and Neubauer, F. M.: 1982, J. Geophys. Res. 87, 52.
Neugebauer, M.: 1975, Space Sci. Rev. 17, 221.
Neugebauer, M. and Snyder, C. W.: 1966, J. Geophys. Res. 71, 4469.
Rosenbauer, H., Schwenn, R., Marsch, E., Meyer, B., Miggenrieder, H., Montgomery, M. D., Mühlhäuser, K. H., Philipp, W., Voges, W., and Zink, S. M.: 1977, J. Geophys. 42, 561.
Siscoe, G. L., Crooker, N. L., and Christopher, L.: 1978, Solar Phys. 56, 449.
Steinitz, R. and Eyni, M.: 1980, Astrophys. J. 241, 417.
Svalgaard, L. and Wilcox, J. M.: 1974, Science 186, 51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Paper delivered at the IX-th Lindau Workshop ‘The Source Region of the Solar Wind’.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steinitz, R. Momentum flux invariance and solar wind sources. Sol Phys 83, 379–384 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148287
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148287