Skip to main content
Log in

Rail policy in Britain — What next?

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 1974 Railways Act set British Rail (BR) the rather vague objective of providing a passenger service broadly comparable with that then existing within a given level of support. For the first few years under the Act, BR succeeded in operating within the financial constraints imposed, but only by considerable increases in charges and by negotiating wage settlements which implied declining real wages. From 1978 on, rising labour costs and reduction in traffic led to a rapidly developing crisis in BR's financial position.

The position of each section of BR's business is discussed briefly. It is shown that the designation of some sectors as being purely commercial is inappropriate, since this means that benefits to users and to the community at large are ignored in decision-making. Similarly, the direction to maintain “social” passenger services at a given level means that finance and investment are concentrated unduly on preservation of the existing pattern of service, rather than on providing value for money. In both sectors, the likelihood is that in general fares are too high and services too frequent.

At an operational level, the criterion of maximising the (weighted) volume of traffic carried is advocated as a practical way of choosing between alternative fare and service-level packages. More broadly based strategic studies would be needed to decide on the weights to be adopted, the level of finance to be made available, and the overall strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • British Railways Board (1983). The Review of Railway Finances — The Initial Response by the British Railways Board.

  • British Railways Board/ Leeds University (1979). A Comparative Study of European Rail Performance.

  • Department of Transport/ British Railways Board (1981). Review of Main Line Electrification. Final Report.

  • Department of Transport (1983). Railway Finances: Report of a Committee chaired by Sir David Serpell, KCB, CMG, OBE. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, J. S. (1978). “Cost-benefit analysis and the British railway network”, Transportation 6: 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairhurst, M. (1982). “Public transport subsidies and value for money”, London Transport Economic Research Report R252.

  • Fowkes, A. S. (1982). “Track costs for road freight”, Proceedings of the Summer Annual Meeting, Planning and Transportation Research and Computation.

  • Glaister, S. (1983). “Some characteristics of rail commuter demand”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 17: 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaister, S. and Collings, J. (1978). “Theory and practice of maximising passenger miles”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 12: 304–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwilliam, K. M. and Mackie, P. J. (1975). Economics and Transport Policy. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, M. and Whalley, A. (1980). The Social Consequences of Rail Closures. London: Policy Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO (1980). Monopolies and Mergers Commission Report on BR London and South East Commuter Services. Cmnd. 8046. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, I. S. and Nichols, A. J. (1983). “Demand for Inter City rail travel,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 17: 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sir, George Leitch (Chairman) (1977). Report of the Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, R. H. and Tyler, E. (1981). “The elasticity of medium distance rail travel,” TRRL Report LR 993.

  • Select Committee on Transport (1982a). Second Report, Session 1981–2. Main Line Railway Electrification. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Select Committee on Transport (1982b). Fifth Report, Session 1981–2. Transport in London. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nash, C.A. Rail policy in Britain — What next?. Transportation 12, 243–259 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146944

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146944

Keywords

Navigation