Abstract
The 1974 Railways Act set British Rail (BR) the rather vague objective of providing a passenger service broadly comparable with that then existing within a given level of support. For the first few years under the Act, BR succeeded in operating within the financial constraints imposed, but only by considerable increases in charges and by negotiating wage settlements which implied declining real wages. From 1978 on, rising labour costs and reduction in traffic led to a rapidly developing crisis in BR's financial position.
The position of each section of BR's business is discussed briefly. It is shown that the designation of some sectors as being purely commercial is inappropriate, since this means that benefits to users and to the community at large are ignored in decision-making. Similarly, the direction to maintain “social” passenger services at a given level means that finance and investment are concentrated unduly on preservation of the existing pattern of service, rather than on providing value for money. In both sectors, the likelihood is that in general fares are too high and services too frequent.
At an operational level, the criterion of maximising the (weighted) volume of traffic carried is advocated as a practical way of choosing between alternative fare and service-level packages. More broadly based strategic studies would be needed to decide on the weights to be adopted, the level of finance to be made available, and the overall strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
British Railways Board (1983). The Review of Railway Finances — The Initial Response by the British Railways Board.
British Railways Board/ Leeds University (1979). A Comparative Study of European Rail Performance.
Department of Transport/ British Railways Board (1981). Review of Main Line Electrification. Final Report.
Department of Transport (1983). Railway Finances: Report of a Committee chaired by Sir David Serpell, KCB, CMG, OBE. London: HMSO.
Dodgson, J. S. (1978). “Cost-benefit analysis and the British railway network”, Transportation 6: 149–170.
Fairhurst, M. (1982). “Public transport subsidies and value for money”, London Transport Economic Research Report R252.
Fowkes, A. S. (1982). “Track costs for road freight”, Proceedings of the Summer Annual Meeting, Planning and Transportation Research and Computation.
Glaister, S. (1983). “Some characteristics of rail commuter demand”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 17: 115–132.
Glaister, S. and Collings, J. (1978). “Theory and practice of maximising passenger miles”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 12: 304–321.
Gwilliam, K. M. and Mackie, P. J. (1975). Economics and Transport Policy. London: Allen and Unwin.
Hillman, M. and Whalley, A. (1980). The Social Consequences of Rail Closures. London: Policy Studies Institute.
HMSO (1980). Monopolies and Mergers Commission Report on BR London and South East Commuter Services. Cmnd. 8046. London: HMSO.
Jones, I. S. and Nichols, A. J. (1983). “Demand for Inter City rail travel,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 17: 133–153.
Sir, George Leitch (Chairman) (1977). Report of the Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment. London: HMSO.
Oldfield, R. H. and Tyler, E. (1981). “The elasticity of medium distance rail travel,” TRRL Report LR 993.
Select Committee on Transport (1982a). Second Report, Session 1981–2. Main Line Railway Electrification. London: HMSO.
Select Committee on Transport (1982b). Fifth Report, Session 1981–2. Transport in London. London: HMSO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nash, C.A. Rail policy in Britain — What next?. Transportation 12, 243–259 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146944
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146944