Abstract
This article argues that the so-called crisis in evaluation is phenomenological rather than empirical. That is, our statements about evaluation, the presentational strategies used to define our expertise, and the ceremonies surrounding the dissemination of results are more problematic than what it is we actually do. If we can avoid calling attention to imaginary wolves, people might well listen when we do have something to say.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Binder, Arnold and Gilbert Geis (1983). Methods of Research in Criminology and Criminal Justice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Campbell, D. T. and J. C. Stanley (1966). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
Caplan, Nathan (1979). “The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization,” American Behavioral Scientist 22: 459–470.
Carton, Bayard L. and Michael Harmon (1981). “Action theory in practice: toward theory without conspiracy,” Public Administration Review 41: 535–541.
Chelimsky, Eleanor (1982). “Making evaluations relevant to congressional needs,” GAO Review 17: 22–27.
Cook, T. D. and D. T. Campbell (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
Chen, Huey-Tsyh and Peter H. Rossi (1981). “The multi-goal, theory driven approach to evaluation: a model linking basic and applied social science,” in H. E. Freeman and M. A. Solomon (eds.), Evaluation Studies Review Annual, vol. 6. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Cronbach, Lee J. and Associates (1980). Toward Reform of Program Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Deal, Terrence E. and Allan A. Kennedy (1982). Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Edelman, Murray (1977). Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail. New York: Academic Press.
Fishman, R. (1977). “An evaluation of criminal recidivism in projects providing rehabilitation and diversion services in New York City,” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 68: 283–305.
Freeman, Howard E. and Marian A. Solomon (1981). “Introduction: evaluation and the uncertain '80's,” in H. E. Freeman and M. A. Solomon (eds.), Evaluation Studies Review Annual, vol. 6. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Gieryn, Thomas F. (1983). “Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science,” American Sociological Review 48: 781–795.
Gilsinan, James F. (1973). “Ethnomethodology and symbolic interaction: a comparison,” The Rocky Mountain Social Science Journal 10: 73–83.
Gilsinan, James F. (1984). “Information and knowledge development potential: the public vs. private sector jobs demonstration project,” Evaluation Review 8: 371–388.
Glaser, Daniel (1980). “The interplay of theory, issues, policy, and data,” in Klein and Teilmann (eds.), Handbook of Criminal Justice Evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Guba, Egon (1978). Toward A Methodology of Naturalistic Inquiry In Educational Evaluation. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, U. of Calif.
Hackler, J. C. (1978). The Prevention of Crime: The Great Stumble Forward. Toronto: Methuen.
House, E. R. (1982). “Introduction: scientific and humanistic evaluations,” in E. R. House (ed.), Evaluation Studies Review Annual. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Lerman, P. (1975). Community Treatment and Social Control. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Levi-Strauss, Claude (1963). Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
Lindblom, Charles E. and David Cohen (1979). Useable Knowledge. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lipton, D., R. Martinson and J. Wilks (1975). The Effectiveness of Correctional Treatment. New York: Prager.
Meltsner A. J.and C. Bellavita (1983). The Policy Organization. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Merton, Robert (1973). The Sociology of Science. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Nakamura, R. T. and F. Smallwood (1980). The Politics of Policy Implementation. New York: Basic Books.
Palumbo, Dennis J. and David Nachmias (1983). “The preconditions for successful evaluation: is there an ideal paradigm?” Policy Sciences 16: 67–79.
Prather, James E. and Frank K. Gibson (1977). “The failure of social programs,” Public Administration Review 37: 556–563.
Reichardt, Charles S. and Thomas D. Cook (1979). “Beyond qualitative vs. quantitative methods,” in T. D. Cook and C. S. Reichardt (eds.), Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Sarbin, Theodore R. (1972). “Schizophrenia is a myth, born of a metaphor, meaningless,” Psychology Today 6: 18–27.
Schuman, H. (1982). “Artifacts are in the mind of the beholder,” American Sociologist 17: 21–8.
Scriven, M. (1972). “Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation,” Evaluation Comment 3: 1–4.
Trend, M. G. (1979). “On the reconciliation of qualitative and quantitative analyses: a case study,” in T. D. Cook and C. S. Reichardt (eds.), Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Weick, Karl (1969). The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Weiss, Robert and Martin Rein (1969). “The evaluation of broad-aim programs: a cautionary case and a moral,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 385: 133–142.
Wilson, Thomas P.(1970). “Normative and interpretive paradigms in sociology,” in Jack D. Douglas (ed.), Understanding Everyday Life. Chicago: Aldine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gilsinan, J.F., Volpe, L.C. Do not cry wolf until you are sure: The manufactured crises in evaluation research. Policy Sci 17, 179–191 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146927
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146927