Skip to main content
Log in

Neighborhood participation in community development: A comparison of strategic approaches

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compares the ability of community development corporations to mobilize residents of low income neighborhoods to participate in redevelopment efforts. The evidence and argument show that community development corporations have not been more successful than other types of community-based organizations in (1) the degree to which organizational leadership has been recruited from the neighborhood; (2) the type of control exercised by residents over redevelopment policy, and; (3) the degree of fiscal autonomy achieved by the organization. The policy ramifications of the findings are discussed and analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altshuler, Alan (1970). Community Control: The Black Demand for Participation in Large American Cities. New York: Pegasus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, Harry (1977). New Rulers in the Ghetto. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluestone, Harry and Bennett Harrison (1982). The Deindustrialization of America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyte, Harry (1980). The Backyard Revolution. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCED (1978). A Partial List of Community-Based Organizations in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Center for Community Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Kenneth and Jeannette Hopkins (1968). A Relevant War Against Poverty. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Scott (1980). Self-Help in Urban America. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Scott and Mark Glaser (1983). “An examination of the perceived effectiveness of community development corporations,” Journal of Urban Affairs 4: 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Scott and Mark Glaser (1985). “Selecting sound investments for community development corporations,” Journal of Community Action (forthcoming).

  • Cummings, Scott and Mark Rosentraub (1978). “Evaluation research: how to negotiate scientific rigor,” Social Work Research and Abstracts 14: 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daykin, David (1984). “The limits to neighborhood power: progressive politics and local control in Santa Monica.” Unpublished manuscript.

  • Fainstein, Norman and Susan Fainstein (1974). Urban Political Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, David and Herbert Franklin (1976). Equal Housing Opportunity. Washington, DC: Potomac Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, Leonard (1971). The Ecology of the Public Schools. New York: Pegasus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, John and Goetz Wolff (1982). “World city formation: an agenda for research and action,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 6: 309–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galper, Jeffrey (1975). The Politics of Social Services. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Gilda and Allan Heskin (1981). “Community struggles in Los Angeles,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 5: 547–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallman, Howard (1974). Neighborhood Government in a Metropolitan Setting. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallman, Howard (1977). The Organization and Operation of Neighborhood Councils. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggett, John C. (1973). Taking State Power. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitan, Sar and Robert Taggart (1976). The Promise of Greatness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, Harvey (1979). “Capital and neighborhood in the United States,” Urban Affairs Quarterly 14: 289–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, William (1976). “Services integration and the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare,” Evaluation 3: 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, Daniel Patrick (1970). Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Charles (1984). Losing Ground. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, Stewart (1973). Federal Support for CDCs: Some of the History and Issues of Community Control. Cambridge, MA: Center for Community Economic Devlopment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilisuk, Mark and Phyllis Pilisuk (1973). How We Lost the War on Poverty. New Brunswick, NJ: E.P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, Frances Fox and Richard Cloward (1977). Poor Peoples' Movements. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, Robert (1979). Confront or Concede. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitch, H.V. and Madeline Adler (1974). Decentralization at the Grass Roots. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Barry (1973). “How successful are CDCs?” The Review of Black Political Economy 3: 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, Donald and Dennis Judd (1982). “Capital investment in neighborhoods,” Population Research and Policy Review 1: 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabb, William (1970). The Political Economy of the Black Ghetto. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cummings, S., Glaser, M. Neighborhood participation in community development: A comparison of strategic approaches. Popul Res Policy Rev 4, 267–287 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146657

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146657

Keywords

Navigation