Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Possible confounders of the relationship between occupational swine contact and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:3 and 0:9 antibodies

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased risk of high Yersinia enterocolitica 0:3 and 0:9 antibody content has been previously reported in occupations with swine contact. In this study several possible confounders of this elevated risk among pig farmers and abattoir workers were considered. Only in three instances the standardized risk ratio was decreased close to unity, namely after the standardization of Y. enterocolitica 0:3 IgG antibody positivity for age among abattoir workers, after the standardization of Y. enterocolitica 0:9 IgG antibody positivity for farm butchering among pig farmers and for smoking among abattoir workers. As the decrease did not apply for both pig farmers and abattoir workers and for both 0:3 and 0:9 serotypes considered, it seems reasonable to assume that the three decreases represent products of multiple testing inherent in this kind of search of confounders rather than any true effects. In view of the present knowledge on the determinants of yersinia antibodies in populations, the crude risk ratios for elevated yersinia antibodies can be held to be reasonably unconfounded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aldova E. and Svandova E. (1984): Yersinia enterocolitica 03 findings on porcine tongues in comparison with Yersinosis incidence in man in Czechoslovakia - J. Hyg. Epidemiol. Microbiol. Immunol. 28: 319–329.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asplund K., Tuovinen V., Veijalainen P., Hirn J. (1990): The prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica 0:3 in Finnish pigs and pork - Acta Vet. Scand. 31: 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christensen S.G. (1987): The Yersinia enterocolitica situation in Denmark - Contr. Microbiol. Immunol. 9: 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cover T.L. and Aber R.C. (1989): Yersinia enterocolitica - N. Engl. J. Med. 321: 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fukushima H., Nakumura R., Ito Y. and Saito K. (1983): Ecological studies of Yersinia enterocolitica. I. Dissemination of Y. enterocolitica in pigs - Vet. Med. 112: 469–483.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Granfors K. (1979): Measurement of immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG and IgA antibodies against Yersinia enterocolitica by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: Persistence of serum antibodies during disease- J. Clin. Microbiol. 9: 336–341.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Granfors K., Lahesmaa-Rantala R., Stahlberg Th., Toivanen A. (1989): Comparison of bacteria with and without plasmid-encoded proteins as antigens for measurement of immunoglobulin M, G, and A antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay - J. Clin. Microbiol. 27: 583–585.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hunter D. and Hughes S. (1983): Isolation of Yersinia enterocolitica from pigs in the United Kingdom - Vet. Rec. 112: 332–333.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kolos E.N., Gnutov I.N., Iushenko S.V. and Dunaev V.I. (1985): Agricultural animals as the sources of Yersinosis - Zh. Microbiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol. 4: 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Langeland G. (1983): Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia enterocolitica-like bacteria in drinking water and sewage sludge - Acta Path. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand., Sect. B, 91: 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lassen J. (1972): Yersinia enterocolitica in drinking-water- Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 4: 125–127.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Merilahti-Palo R., Lahesmaa R., Granfors K., Gripenberg-Lerche C. and Toivanen P. (1991): Risk of yersinia infection among butchers - Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 23: 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miettinen O.S. (1985): Theoretical epidemiology - 1st ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons: 370–372.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nesbakken T., Kapperud G., Lassen J. and Skjerve E. (1991): Yersinia enterocolitica 0:3 antibodies in slaughterhouse employees, veterinarians, and military recruits - Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 12: 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seuri M. and Granfors K. (1992): Antibodies against Yersinia among farmers and slaughter house workers- Scand. J. Work Environ. & Health 18: 128–132.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tauxe R.V., Vandepitte J., Wauters G., Martin S.M., Goossens V., De Mol P., VanNoyen R. and Thiers G. (1987): Yersinia enterocolitica infections and pork; the missing link - Lancet 1: 1129–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wauters G. (1979): Carriage of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 3 by pigs as a source of human infection -Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 5: 253–256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Community Health and General Practice, University of Kuopio, POB 1627, SF 70211, KUOPIO, FINLAND

    M. Seuri

  2. Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Turku, FINLAND

    K. Granfors

Authors
  1. M. Seuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Granfors
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Corresponding author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seuri, M., Granfors, K. Possible confounders of the relationship between occupational swine contact and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:3 and 0:9 antibodies. Eur J Epidemiol 8, 532–538 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146372

Key words

Search

Navigation