Skip to main content
Log in

Tilt-angle variations of active regions

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An examination of the tilt angles of multi-spot sunspot groups and plages shows that on average they tend to rotate toward the average tilt angle in each hemisphere. This average tilt angle is about twice as large for plages as it is for sunspot groups. The larger the deviation from the average tilt angle, the larger, on average, is the rotation of the magnetic axis in the direction of the average tilt angle. The rate of rotation of the magnetic axis is about twice as fast for sunspot groups as it is for plages. Growing plages and spot groups rotate their axes significantly faster than do decaying plages and spot groups. There is a latitude dependence of this effect that follows Joy's law. The fact that these tilt angles move toward the average tilt angle and not toward 0 deg (the east-west orientation), combined with other results presented here, suggest that a commonly accepted view of the origin of active region magnetic flux at the solar surface may have to be re-examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babcock, H. W.: 1961, Astrophys. J. 133, 572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhuri, A. R.: 1989, Solar Phys. 123, 239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhuri, A. R.: 1990, Astrophys. J. 355, 733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhuri, A. R. and Gilman, P. A.: 1987, Astrophys. J. 316, 800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhuri, A. R. and D'Silva, S.: 1990, Astron. Astrophys. 239, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca, E. E. and Gilman, P. A.: 1986, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynamics 37, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca, E. E. and Gilman, P. A.: 1991, in A. N. Cox, W. C. Livingston, and M. S. Matthews (eds.), Solar Interior and Atmosphere, University of Arizona Press, Boulder, p. 275.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Silva, S.: 1993, Astrophys. J. 407, 385.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Silva, S. and Choudhuri, A. R.: 1991, Solar Phys. 136, 201.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Silva, S. and Choudhuri, A. R.: 1993, Astron. Astrophys. 272, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Silva, S. and Howard, R. F.: 1993, Solar Phys. 148, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y., Fisher, G. H., and DeLuca, E. E.: 1993, Astrophys. J. 405, 390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, T., Fisher, G. H., and McClymont, A. N.: 1994, Astrophys. J. 436, 907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G. H., Fan, Y., and Howard, R. F.: 1995, Astrophys. J. 438, 463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub, L., Davis, J. M., Vaiana, G. S., and Weiss, N. O.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 243, 309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, G. E., Ellerman, F., Nicholson, S. B., and Joy, A. H.: 1919, Astrophys. J. 49, 153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, K. L.: 1993a, ‘Magnetic Bipoles on the Sun’, Thesis Utrecht University, Chapter 3.

  • Harvey, K. L.: 1993b Solar Phys. 148, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, K. L.: 1996, Solar Phys., in press.

  • Howard, R. F.: 1989, Solar Phys. 123, 271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. F.: 1991a, Solar Phys. 132, 257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. F.: 1991b, Solar Phys. 136, 251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. F.: 1991c, Solar Phys. 132, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. F.: 1991d, Solar Phys. 135, 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. F.: 1991e, Solar Phys. 135, 327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. F.: 1991f, Solar Phys. 134, 233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. F.: 1992, Solar Phys. 137, 205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. F.: 1994, Solar Phys. 149, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. F.: 1996, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 34, in press.

  • Howard, R., Gilman, P. A., and Gilman, P. I.: 1984, Astrophys. J. 283, 373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Insertis, F.: 1992, in J. H. Thomas and N. O. Weiss (eds.), Sunspots, Theory and Observations, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland, p. 385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Insertis, F.: 1994, in M. Schüssler and W. Schmidt (eds.), Solar Magnetic Fields, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. N.: 1955, Astrophys. J. 121, 491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, R.: 1980, in A. K. Dupree (ed.), Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun, Smithsonian Astrophys. Obs. Report, No. 389, p. 79.

  • Schmitt, J. H. M. M. and Rosner, R.: 1983, Astrophys. J. 265, 901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüssler, M.: 1993, in F. Krause, K.-H. Rädler, G. Rüdiger (eds.), ‘The Cosmic Dynamo’, IAU Symp. 157, 27.

  • Schüssler, M., Caligari, P., Ferriz-Mas, A., and Moreno-Insertis, F.: 1994, Astron. Astrophys. 281, L69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, E. A. and Weiss, N. O.: 1980, Nature 287, 616.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ballegooiien, A. A.: 1982, Astron. Astrophys. 113, 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.-M. and Sheeley, N. R., Jr.: 1991, Astrophys. J. 375, 761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, C.: 1992, in J. H. Thomas and N. O. Weiss (eds.), Sunspots: Theory and Observations, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland, p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under Cooperative Agreement with the National Science Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howard, R.F. Tilt-angle variations of active regions. Sol Phys 167, 95–113 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146330

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146330

Keywords

Navigation