Skip to main content
Log in

Solar diameter(s)

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because of the renewed attention now paid to the solar diameter, its variations from equator to pole, or its secular or long-period changes, the question: what is a solar diameter? is not meaningless. Two kinds of definitions may be given: either astrophysical, each one relating to a specific physical parameter, or observational, relating to a given quantity to be measured. Only the second kind is directly accessible, and astrophysical definitions should be linked to these quantities, once they are determined with the highest possible accuracy. In practice, all the programs under way refer to the point of the limb where the brightness gradient is maximum, or to a higher order approximation of the shape of the profile. Two of them are compared: the Pic-du-Midi experiment, using fast scans of the limb to define the inflection point after a correction for the blurring effect of the atmosphere, and the SCLERA experiment, using the algorithm called FFTD to eliminate this correction. The advantage of a fast scan is emphasized, and the remark is formulated that, once the signal is digitized and stored, FFTD or any processing of it can be performed. In collecting day-long one-limb scans to calibrate the blurring correction, the authors have found fluctuations of the maximum brightness gradient which provide a new entry to the field of solar oscillations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brandt, P. N.: 1970, Solar Phys. 13, 243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, R. H. and Goldenberg, H. M.: 1967, Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, R. B. (ed.): 1981, Solar Instrumentation - What's Next, Sacramento Peak Observatory, September 1980.

  • Eddy, J. A. and Boornazian, A. A.: 1979, Phys. Today 32, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, D. L.: 1966, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. A.: 1981, in R. B. Dunn (ed.), Solar Instrumentation - What's Next, Sacramento Peak Observatory, September 1980, p. 300.

  • Hill, H. A., Stebbins, R. T., and Oleson, J. R.: 1975, Astrophys. J. 200, 484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. A., Rosenwald, R. D., and Caudell, T. P.: 1978, Astrophys. J. 225, 304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, J., Hill, H. A., and Caudell, T. P.: 1980, Lecture Notes in Physics, No. 125, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, J. H., Morrison, L. V., and Stephenson, F. R.: 1980, Nature 288, 548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rösch, J.: 1962, Symposium on Solar Seeing, Roma, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rösch, J. and Yerle, R,: 1981, in R. B. Dunn (ed.), Solar Instrumentation - What's Next, Sacramento Peak Observatory, September 1980, p. 366.

  • Stebbins, R. T.: 1980, Lecture Notes on Physics, No. 125, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerle, R.: 1981, Astron. Astrophys. 100, L23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Proceedings of the 66th IAU Colloquium: Problems in Solar and Stellar Oscillations, held at the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, U.S.S.R., 1–5 September, 1981.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rösch, J., Yerle, R. Solar diameter(s). Sol Phys 82, 139–150 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145554

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145554

Keywords

Navigation