Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of an improved RAPD fingerprinting with different typing methods for discriminating clinical isolates of Staphylococcus spp.

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different epidemiological markers were used to characterize 2 Staphylococcus epidermidis and 8 Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from patients with severe infections. We compared random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprints, biotypes, antibiotic assays, plasmid profiles and chromosomal DNA restriction endonuclease analysis (REA). Data analysis based on numerical taxonomy methods indicates that RAPD and REA give similar results allowing a good discrimination of the two species and of each isolate. The RAPD method is easier and faster than REA, but the reproducibility of RAPD fingerprints obtained in independent experiments can be problematic. We have found simple technical devices to improve the reproducibility of the RAPD procedure which is therefore a very useful tool in epidemiology for identification and characterization of Staphylococcus spp.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Renaud F, Freney J, Etienne J, et al. Restriction endonuclease analysis of Staphylococcus epidermidis may be a useful epidemiological marker. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26: 1729–1734.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Birnbaum D, Kelly M, Chow AW. Epidemiologic typing systems for coagulase-negative staphylococci. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991; 12: 319–326.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pfaller MA, Wakefield DS, Hollis R, et al. The clinical microbiology laboratory as an aid in infection control: The application of molecular techniques in epidemiologic studies of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1991; 14: 209–2174.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goetz MB, Mulligan ME, Kwok R, et al. Management and epidemiologic analysis of an outbreak due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Med 1992; 92: 607–614.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kreiswirth B, Kornblum J, Arbeit RD, et al. Evidence for a clonal origin of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Science 1993; 259: 227–230.

    Google Scholar 

  6. van Belkum A, Bax R, Peerbooms P, et al. Comparison of phage typing and DNA fingerprinting by polymerase chain reaction for discrimination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 798–803.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Struelens MJ, Bax R, Deplano A, et al. Concordant clonal delineation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by macrorestriction analysis and polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 1964–1970.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saulnier P, Bourneix C, Prevost B, et al. Random amplified polymorphic DNA assay is less discriminant than pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Mocrobiol 1993; 31: 982–985.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bingen E. Application of molecular methods to epidemiologic investigations of nosocomial infections in a pediatric hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994; 15: 488–493.

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Belkum A, Bax R, Prevost G. Comparison of four genotyping assay for epidemiological study of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1994; 13: 420–424.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schumacher F, Jansen B, Seifert H, et al. Outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a teaching hospital: Epidemiological and microbial surveillance. J Med Microbiol 1994; 280: 550–559.

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Lencastre H, Couto I, Melo-Cristino I, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in a Portuguese hospital: Characterization of clonal types by a combination of DNA typing methods. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1994; 13: 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haertl R, Bandlow G. Genotyping of Staphylococcus epidermidis by small-fragment restriction endonuclease analysis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of genomic restriction fragments. Microbiol Immunol 1994; 38: 527–534.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zambardi G, Reverdy ME, Bland S, et al. Laboratory diagnosis of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by a multiplex-polymerase reaction assay. Diagn Microb Infect Dis 1994; 19: 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tenover FC, Arbeit R, Archer G, et al. Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32: 407–415.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gurtler V, Barrie HD. Typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains by PCR-amplification of variable-length 16S-23S rDNA spacer regions: Characterization of spacer sequences. Microbiol 1995; 141: 1255–1265.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Welsh J, McClelland M. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res 1990; 18: 7213–7218.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, et al. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 1990; 18: 6531–6535.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Williams JGK, Hanafey MK, Rafalski JA, et al. Genetic analysis using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. In: Wu R (ed), Methods in enzymology. New York: Academic Press, 1993; 218: 704–740.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Almeida RJ, Jorgensen JH. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci with the API STAPHIDENT system. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18: 254–257.

    Google Scholar 

  21. NCCLS Performed standards for antimicrobial susceptibility tests, 5th ed, Approved standard. M2-A5 1993; Vol. 13, No. 24.

  22. Barsotti O, Renaud F, Freney J, et al. Rapid isolation of DNA from Actinomyces. Ann Microbiol (Inst. Pasteur) 1987; 138: 529–536.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Asubel FM, Brent R, Kingstone RE, et al. (eds). Current protocols in molecular biology. New York: J Wiley & Sons, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (eds). Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sokal RR, Sneath PHA (eds). Principles of numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman and Co., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 1967; 27: 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rohlf FJ (ed). NTSYS-pc Version 1.70. New York: Exeter Software, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Damiani, G., Telecco, S., Comincini, S. et al. Comparison of an improved RAPD fingerprinting with different typing methods for discriminating clinical isolates of Staphylococcus spp.. Eur J Epidemiol 12, 163–169 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145502

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145502

Key words

Navigation